The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional specificity in the right human auditory cortex for perceiving pitch direction
Abstract
Previous lesion and functional imaging studies in humans suggest a greater involvement of right rather than left auditory cortical areas in certain aspects of pitch processing. In the present study, adaptive psychophysical procedures were used to determine auditory perceptual thresholds in 14 neurologically normal subjects, and in 31 patients who had undergone surgical resection from either the right or left temporal lobe for the relief of intractable epilepsy. In a subset of the patients, the lesion encroached significantly upon the gyrus of Heschl or its underlying white matter as determined from MRI analysis. Subjects were asked to perform two different perceptual tasks on the same set of stimuli. In a pitch discrimination task, the subject had to decide whether two elements of a pure tone pair were the same or different. In a task requiring the judgement of direction of pitch change, subjects decided whether pitch rose or fell from the first tone to the second. Thresholds were determined by measuring the minimum pitch difference required for correct task performance. Mean thresholds in the pitch discrimination task did not differ between patient groups and control subjects. In contrast, patients with temporal lobe excisions that encroached upon the gyrus of Heschl in the right hemisphere (but not in the left) showed significantly elevated thresholds when judging the direction of pitch change. These findings support a specialization of function linked to right auditory cortical areas for the processing of pitch direction, and specifically suggest a dissociation between simple sensory discrimination and higher order perception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing
Zatorre, R. J., Evans, A. C., Meyer, E., & Gjedde, A. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.256.5058.846 · Cited by 1,507
Self-citation
Cited by
When the brain plays music: auditory–motor interactions in music perception and production
Zatorre, R. J., Chen, J. L., & Penhune, V. B. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2152 · Cited by 1,754
Self-citationStevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology
(2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471214426 · Cited by 1,632
Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe
Scott, S. K. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.12.2400 · Cited by 1,160
Brain Organization for Music Processing
Peretz, I., & Zatorre, R. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070225 · Cited by 863
Self-citationThe Processing of Temporal Pitch and Melody Information in Auditory Cortex
Patterson, R. D., Uppenkamp, S., Johnsrude, I. S., & Griffiths, T. D. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01060-7 · Cited by 720
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnsrude, I. S., Penhune, V. B., & Zatorre, R. J.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 155-163
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2167787446
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional specificity in the right human auditory cortex for perceiving pitch direction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/123.1.155
- The paper
- Johnsrude, I. S., Penhune, V. B., & Zatorre, R. J. (2000). Functional specificity in the right human auditory cortex for perceiving pitch direction. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.1.155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.