Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Encoding of burning pain from capsaicin-treated human skin in two categories of unmyelinated nerve fibres

Schmelz, M.·2000·Brain

Abstract

Burning pain was induced in healthy human subjects by intracutaneous injections of capsaicin (20 microl, 0.1%) in the innervation territory of the cutaneous branch of the peroneal nerve and the pain responses were compared with the activation patterns of afferent C-fibres recorded by microneurography. Responsiveness of single units to mechanical or heat stimuli or to sympathetic reflex provocation tests was determined by transient slowing of conduction velocity following activation (marking technique). Capsaicin activated each of 12 mechano-responsive and 17 of 20 mechano-insensitive C-units. However, the duration of the responses to capsaicin was significantly longer in mechano-insensitive C-units (median 170 s; quartiles 80-390) compared with mechano-responsive C-units (8 s; 4-10). The activation times of mechano-insensitive C-units closely matched the duration of capsaicin-induced pain responses, whereas activation of mechano-responsive C-units was too short to account for the duration of the burning pain. The latter generally were desensitized to mechanical stimulation at the injection site, whereas 8 of 17 of the originally mechano-insensitive C-units became responsive to mechanical probing at the injection site after capsaicin. Responses typically started several seconds after the onset of the mechanical stimulus in parallel with pain sensations. We did not observe sensitization to brushing or to punctate stimuli in uninjured parts of the innervation territory. Differential capsaicin sensitivity adds to the cumulating evidence for the existence of two categories of functionally different nociceptors in human skin, with a special role for mechano-insensitive fibres in sensitization and hyperalgesia. Possible structural differences between these two categories are discussed, including the role of tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/123.3.560

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Schmelz, M.
Venue
Brain
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
123
Issue
3
Pages
560-571
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2126309451
Cited by
296
References
1
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Encoding of burning pain from capsaicin-treated human skin in two categories of unmyelinated nerve fibres. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/123.3.560
The paper
Schmelz, M. (2000). Encoding of burning pain from capsaicin-treated human skin in two categories of unmyelinated nerve fibres. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.3.560

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.