An experimental critique of the effects of anterior cingulate ablations in monkey
Abstract
KARL H. PRIBRAM, JOHN F. FULTON; AN EXPERIMENTAL CRITIQUE OF THE EFFECTS OF ANTERIOR CINGULATE ABLATIONS IN MONKEY1, Brain, Volume 77, Issue 1, 1 March 195
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Monkeys with anterior cingulate lesions seemed to show no consistent, overt changes in social behaviour, activity, or vocalisation.
“Likewise, monkeys with anterior cingulate lesions seemed to show no consistent, overt changes in social behaviour, activity, or vocalisation (Pribram and Fulton, 1954).”
From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Pribram and Fulton, 1954
Working memory per se is preserved following dorsal cingulum bundle damage.
“Taken together, these findings indicate a preservation of working memory per se following dorsal cingulum bundle damage (Meunier et al., 1997; Murray et al., 1989; Pribram and Fulton., 1954).”
From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Pribram and Fulton., 1954
Anterior cingulate lesions can spare spatial delayed response.
“Related results include how anterior cingulate lesions can spare spatial delayed response (Pribram and Fulton, 1954)”
From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Pribram and Fulton, 1954
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction
Bubb, E. J., Metzler-Baddeley, C., & Aggleton, J. P. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.008 · Cited by 740 · see citing works
“Related results include how anterior cingulate lesions can spare spatial delayed response (Pribram and Fulton, 1954), although more extensive anterior cingulate removals above and below the genu (Meunier et al.”
Stereotaxic anterior cingulotomy for neuropsychiatric illness and intractable pain
Ballantine, H. T., Cassidy, W. L., Flanagan, N. B., & Marino, R. (1967) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1967.26.5.0488 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
The effect of cingulate cortex lesions on task switching and working memory
Rushworth, M. F. S., Hadland, K. A., Gaffan, D., & Passingham, R. E. (2003) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892903321593072 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
- Authors
- PRIBRAM, K. H., & FULTON, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1954
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-44
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2087366977
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- anterior cingulate cortex, monkeys, frontal lobe function
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Haplorhini, Behavior, Cerebral Cortex, Gyrus Cinguli
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review