The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SIMPLE REACTION TIME: EVIDENCE FOR FOCAL IMPAIRMENT FROM LESIONS OF THE RIGHT HEMISPHERE
Abstract
Simple reaction time is significantly increased in patients with unilateral lesions of either cerebral hemisphere responding with the hand ipsilateral to the lesion, but the effect is much greater when the lesion is in the non-dominant hemisphere. This difference cannot be attributed to asymmetries in the size or type of lesion. It applies over the complete distribution of reaction times as well as to the means, and is not diminished by practice. Neither the classical conduction model of reaction time nor the mass-action hypothesis proposed by De Renzi and Faglioni (1965) can account for the findings. Although the increase of about 100 ms observed with lesions of the dominant hemisphere probably represents a non-specific effect of brain disease, the much larger increases resulting from lesions of the non-dominant hemisphere appear to be of focal origin. The critical areas cannot yet be specified with certainty, but maps of the brain scans for patients with the highest reaction times suggest that structures in or near the basal ganglia and the posterior parietal region of the non-dominant hemisphere are involved, and other studies show that the focal effect is not found when patients with contralateral motor involvement are excluded.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect
Mesulam, M. ‐. (1981) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410100402 · Cited by 2,498
Spatial Neglect and Attention Networks
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2011) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113731 · Cited by 1,318
Vallar, G., & Perani, D. (1986) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(86)90001-1 · Cited by 834
Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0030694 · Cited by 746
On the Functional Neuroanatomy of Intrinsic and Phasic Alertness
Sturm, W., & Willmes, K. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0839 · Cited by 709
Metadata
- Authors
- HOWES, D., & BOLLER, F.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1975
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 317-332
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2148147160
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SIMPLE REACTION TIME: EVIDENCE FOR FOCAL IMPAIRMENT FROM LESIONS OF THE RIGHT HEMISPHERE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/98.2.317
- The paper
- HOWES, D., & BOLLER, F. (1975). SIMPLE REACTION TIME: EVIDENCE FOR FOCAL IMPAIRMENT FROM LESIONS OF THE RIGHT HEMISPHERE. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/98.2.317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.