Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Definitions and classification of malformations of cortical development: practical guidelines

Open access
Severino, Mariasavina, Geraldo, Ana Filipa, Utz, Norbert, Tortora, Domenico, Pogledic, Ivana, Klonowski, Wlodzimierz, Triulzi, Fabio, Arrigoni, Filippo, Mankad, Kshitij, Leventer, Richard J, Mancini, Grazia M S, Barkovich, James A, Lequin, Maarten H, Rossi, Andrea·2020·Brain

Abstract

Malformations of cortical development are a group of rare disorders commonly manifesting with developmental delay, cerebral palsy or seizures. The neurological outcome is extremely variable depending on the type, extent and severity of the malformation and the involved genetic pathways of brain development. Neuroimaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis of these malformations, but several issues regarding malformations of cortical development definitions and classification remain unclear. The purpose of this consensus statement is to provide standardized malformations of cortical development terminology and classification for neuroradiological pattern interpretation. A committee of international experts in paediatric neuroradiology prepared systematic literature reviews and formulated neuroimaging recommendations in collaboration with geneticists, paediatric neurologists and pathologists during consensus meetings in the context of the European Network Neuro-MIG initiative on Brain Malformations (https://www.neuro-mig.org/). Malformations of cortical development neuroimaging features and practical recommendations are provided to aid both expert and non-expert radiologists and neurologists who may encounter patients with malformations of cortical development in their practice, with the aim of improving malformations of cortical development diagnosis and imaging interpretation worldwide.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awaa174

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 108 references

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Severino, M., Geraldo, A. F., Utz, N., Tortora, D., Pogledic, I., Klonowski, W., Triulzi, F., Arrigoni, F., Mankad, K., Leventer, R. J., Mancini, G. M. S., Barkovich, J. A., Lequin, M. H., & Rossi, A.
Venue
Brain
Published
2020-08-10
Volume
143
Issue
10
Pages
2874-2894
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W3048371187
Cited by
313
References
108
FWCI
32.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Definitions and classification of malformations of cortical development: practical guidelines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awaa174
The paper
Severino, M., Geraldo, A. F., Utz, N., Tortora, D., Pogledic, I., Klonowski, W., Triulzi, F., Arrigoni, F., Mankad, K., Leventer, R. J., Mancini, G. M. S., Barkovich, J. A., Lequin, M. H., & Rossi, A. (2020). Definitions and classification of malformations of cortical development: practical guidelines. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa174

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.