The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortical and subcortical pathological burden and neuronal loss in an autopsy series of FTLD-TDP-type C
Open accessAbstract
The TDP-43 type C pathological form of frontotemporal lobar degeneration is characterized by the presence of immunoreactive TDP-43 short and long dystrophic neurites, neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions, neuronal loss and gliosis and the absence of neuronal intranuclear inclusions. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration-TDP-type C cases are commonly associated with the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia or behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Here, we provide detailed characterization of regional distributions of pathological TDP-43 and neuronal loss and gliosis in cortical and subcortical regions in 10 TDP-type C cases and investigate the relationship between inclusions and neuronal loss and gliosis. Specimens were obtained from the first 10 TDP-type C cases accessioned from the Northwestern Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia, n = 7; behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, n = 3). A total of 42 cortical (majority bilateral) and subcortical regions were immunostained with a phosphorylated TDP-43 antibody and/or stained with haematoxylin-eosin. Regions were evaluated for atrophy, and for long dystrophic neurites, short dystrophic neurites, neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions, and neuronal loss and gliosis using a semiquantitative 5-point scale. We calculated a 'neuron-to-inclusion' score (TDP-type C mean score - neuronal loss and gliosis mean score) for each region per case to assess the relationship between TDP-type C inclusions and neuronal loss and gliosis. Primary progressive aphasia cases demonstrated leftward asymmetry of cortical atrophy consistent with the aphasic phenotype. We also observed abundant inclusions and neurodegeneration in both cortical and subcortical regions, with certain subcortical regions emerging as particularly vulnerable to dystrophic neurites (e.g. amygdala, caudate and putamen). Interestingly, linear mixed models showed that regions with lowest TDP-type C pathology had high neuronal dropout, and conversely, regions with abundant pathology displayed relatively preserved neuronal densities (P < 0.05). This inverse relationship between the extent of TDP-positive inclusions and neuronal loss may reflect a process whereby inclusions disappear as their associated neurons are lost. Together, these findings offer insight into the putative substrates of neurodegeneration in unique dementia syndromes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The distinctive atrophy pattern in svPPA is usually due to the presence of TDP-43 Type C neuropathology in these regions.
“This distinctive atrophy pattern is usually due to the presence of TDP-43 Type C neuropathology in these regions (Kawles et al., 2022; Keszycki et al., 2022).”
From Differential diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia subtypes with explainable deep learning on structural MRI (2024) · cites this paper as Kawles et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
Mackenzie, I. R. A., Neumann, M., Bigio, E. H., Cairns, N. J., Alafuzoff, I., Kril, J., Kovacs, G. G., Ghetti, B., Halliday, G., Holm, I. E., et al. (2010) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-009-0612-2 · Cited by 1,012
Self-citationFrontal Paralimbic Network Atrophy in Very Mild Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia
Seeley, W. W., Crawford, R., Rascovsky, K., Kramer, J. H., Weiner, M., Miller, B. L., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2008) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2007.38 · Cited by 506
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Cairns, 2007, Neuropathologic diagnostic and nosologic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration: Consensus of the Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration, Acta Neuropathol., 114, 5, 10.1007/s00401-007-0237-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Mesulam, 2003, Primary progressive aphasia—a language-based dementia, N Engl J Med., 349, 1535, 10.1056/NEJMra022435 · DOI
- Rascovsky, 2011, Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia, Brain., 134, 2456, 10.1093/brain/awr179 · DOI · Paper page
- Rogalski, 2014, Asymmetry of cortical decline in subtypes of primary progressive aphasia, Neurology., 83, 1184, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000824 · DOI
- Mesulam, 2016, Primary progressive aphasia and the left hemisphere language network, Dement Neurocogn Disord., 15, 93, 10.12779/dnd.2016.15.4.93 · DOI
- Mesulam, 2005, Primary progressive aphasia: Reversed asymmetry of atrophy and right hemisphere language dominance. Case Reports Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S, Neurology., 64, 556, 10.1212/01.WNL.0000150545.46351.DE · DOI
- Bertoux, 2015, Fronto-striatal atrophy in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease, Front Neurol., 6, 147, 10.3389/fneur.2015.00147 · DOI
- Lu, 2013, Patterns of brain atrophy in clinical variants of frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord., 35, 34, 10.1159/000345523 · DOI
- Rohrer, 2010, TDP-43 subtypes are associated with distinct atrophy patterns in frontotemporal dementia, Neurology., 75, 2204, 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318202038c · DOI · Paper page
- Forman, 2007, TDP-43: A novel neurodegenerative proteinopathy, Curr Opin Neurobiol., 17, 548, 10.1016/j.conb.2007.08.005 · DOI
- Lee, 2017, Expansion of the classification of FTLD-TDP: Distinct pathology associated with rapidly progressive frontotemporal degeneration, Acta Neuropathol., 134, 65, 10.1007/s00401-017-1679-9 · DOI
- Irwin, 2018, Asymmetry of post-mortem neuropathology in behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia, Brain., 141, 288, 10.1093/brain/awx319 · DOI
- Landin-Romero, 2016, An update on semantic dementia: Genetics, imaging, and pathology, Alzheimers Res Ther., 8, 52, 10.1186/s13195-016-0219-5 · DOI
- Grossman, 2007, TDP-43 pathologic lesions and clinical phenotype in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive inclusions, Arch Neurol., 64, 1449, 10.1001/archneur.64.10.1449 · DOI
- Mackenzie, 2011, A harmonized classification system for FTLD-TDP pathology, Acta Neuropathol., 122, 111, 10.1007/s00401-011-0845-8 · DOI
- Gefen, 2018, Combined pathologies in FTLD-TDP types A and C, J Neuropathol Exp Neurol., 77, 405, 10.1093/jnen/nly018 · DOI
- Mesulam, 2001, Primary progressive aphasia, Ann Neurol., 49, 425, 10.1002/ana.91 · DOI
- Mesulam, 2013, Primary progressive aphasia: A dementia of the language network, Dement Neuropsychol., 7, 2, 10.1590/S1980-57642013DN70100002 · DOI
- Mesulam, 1982, Slowly progressive aphasia without generalized dementia, Ann Neurol., 11, 592, 10.1002/ana.410110607 · DOI
- Mao, 2017, Disease and region specificity of granulin immunopositivities in Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration, J Neuropathol Exp Neurol., 76, 957, 10.1093/jnen/nlx085 · DOI
- Bigio, 2013, Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 proteinopathy and chromosome 9p repeat expansion in C9ORF72: Clinicopathologic correlation, Neuropathology., 33, 122, 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2012.01332.x · DOI
- Bocchetta, 2020, In vivo staging of frontotemporal lobar degeneration TDP-43 type C pathology, Alzheimers Res Ther., 12, 34, 10.1186/s13195-020-00600-x · DOI
- Borghesani, 2020, Regional and hemispheric susceptibility of the temporal lobe to FTLD-TDP type C pathology, Neuroimage Clin., 28, 102369, 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102369 · DOI
- Mackenzie, 2020, Subcortical TDP-43 pathology patterns validate cortical FTLD-TDP subtypes and demonstrate unique aspects of C9orf72 mutation cases, Acta Neuropathol., 139, 83, 10.1007/s00401-019-02070-4 · DOI
- Brandmeir, 2008, Severe subcortical TDP-43 pathology in sporadic frontotemporal lobar degeneration with motor neuron disease, Acta Neuropathol., 115, 123, 10.1007/s00401-007-0315-5 · DOI
- Nelson, 2018, The amygdala as a locus of pathologic misfolding in neurodegenerative diseases, J Neuropathol Exp Neurol., 77, 2, 10.1093/jnen/nlx099 · DOI
- Mackenzie, 2006, Heterogeneity of ubiquitin pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: Classification and relation to clinical phenotype, Acta Neuropathol., 112, 539, 10.1007/s00401-006-0138-9 · DOI
- Sampathu, 2006, Pathological heterogeneity of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive inclusions delineated by ubiquitin immunohistochemistry and novel monoclonal antibodies, Am J Pathol., 169, 1343, 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060438 · DOI
- Josephs, 2009, Evaluation of subcortical pathology and clinical correlations in FTLD-U subtypes, Acta Neuropathol., 118, 349, 10.1007/s00401-009-0547-7 · DOI
- Braak, 2013, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis—A model of corticofugal axonal spread, Nat Rev Neurol., 9, 708, 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.221 · DOI
- Kim, 2020, Evidence of corticofugal tau spreading in patients with frontotemporal dementia, Acta Neuropathol., 139, 27, 10.1007/s00401-019-02075-z · DOI
- Braak, 1995, Staging of Alzheimer's disease-related neurofibrillary changes, Neurobiol Aging., 16, 271, 10.1016/0197-4580(95)00021-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Yan, 2017, Formation of dystrophic neurites in Alzheimer's disease, FASEB J., 31, 91.3, 10.1096/fasebj.31.1_supplement.91.3 · DOI
- Sharoar, 2019, Sequential formation of different layers of dystrophic neurites in Alzheimer's brains, Mol Psychiatry., 24, 1369, 10.1038/s41380-019-0396-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Gefen, 2012, Clinically concordant variations of Alzheimer pathology in aphasic versus amnestic dementia, Brain., 135, 1554, 10.1093/brain/aws076 · DOI
- Weintraub, 2009, With or without FUS, it is the anatomy that dictates the dementia phenotype, Brain., 132, 2906, 10.1093/brain/awp286 · DOI
- Mesulam, 2014, Asymmetry and heterogeneity of Alzheimer's and frontotemporal pathology in primary progressive aphasia, Brain., 137, 1176, 10.1093/brain/awu024 · DOI · Paper page
- Kim, 2018, Atrophy and microglial distribution in primary progressive aphasia with transactive response DNA-binding protein-43 kDa, Ann Neurol., 83, 1096, 10.1002/ana.25240 · DOI
- Kim, 2018, Asymmetric TDP pathology in primary progressive aphasia with right hemisphere language dominance, Neurology., 90, e396, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004891 · DOI
- Yousef, 2017, Neuron loss and degeneration in the progression of TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Acta Neuropathol Commun., 5, 68, 10.1186/s40478-017-0471-3 · DOI
- Nishihira, 2009, Sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis of long duration is associated with relatively mild TDP-43 pathology, Acta Neuropathol., 117, 45, 10.1007/s00401-008-0443-6 · DOI
- Bancher, 1989, Tau and ubiquitin immunoreactivity at different stages of formation of Alzheimer neurofibrillary tangles, Prog Clin Biol Res., 317, 837
- Ikeda, 1992, Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study of degenerate neurite-bearing ghost tangles, J Neurol., 239, 191, 10.1007/BF00839138 · DOI
- Endoh, 1993, Lack of the carboxyl terminal sequence of tau in ghost tangles of Alzheimer's disease, Brain Res., 601, 164, 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91707-Y · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ma, D., Stocks, J., Rosen, H., Kantarci, K., Lockhart, S. N., Bateman, J. R., Craft, S., Gurcan, M. N., Popuri, K., Beg, M. F., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1331677 · Cited by 9
“This distinctive atrophy pattern is usually due to the presence of TDP-43 Type C neuropathology in these regions (Kawles et al., 2022; Keszycki et al., 2022).”
BackgroundOhm, D. T., Rhodes, E., Bahena, A., Capp, N., Lowe, M., Sabatini, P., Trotman, W., Olm, C. A., Phillips, J., Prabhakaran, K., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1245886 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Kawles, A., Nishihira, Y., Feldman, A., Gill, N., Minogue, G., Keszycki, R., Coventry, C., Spencer, C., Lilek, J., Ajroud, K., Coppola, G., Rademakers, R., Rogalski, E., Weintraub, S., Zhang, H., Flanagan, M. E., Bigio, E. H., Mesulam, M. M., Geula, C., Mao, Q., & Gefen, T.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Mesulam Center for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Corresponding author
- Gefen, Tamar
- ORCID
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-12-17
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1069-1078
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- PMC
- PMC9050539
- OpenAlex
- W4200115080
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Brain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (P30 AG013854, R01 AG056258, R01 AG062566, K08 AG065463)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- frontotemporal lobar degeneration, neuronal loss, gliosis, dystrophic neurites, neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions, semantic dementia, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, amygdala, caudate nucleus, putamen, neurodegeneration
- MeSH terms
- Atrophy, Autopsy, DNA-Binding Proteins, Gliosis, Humans, Nervous System Malformations, Aphasia, Primary Progressive, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration, Frontotemporal Dementia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review