Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 426

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical predictive factors of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease

Open access
Welter, M. L., Houeto, J. L., Tezenas du Montcel, S., Mesnage, V., Bonnet, A. M., Pillon, B., Arnulf, I., Pidoux, B., Dormont, D., Cornu, P., Agid, Y.·2002·Brain

Abstract

High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) constitutes one of the most effective treatments for advanced forms of Parkinson's disease. The cost and potential risks of this procedure encourage the determination of clinical characteristics of patients that will have the best postoperative outcome. Forty-one Parkinson's disease patients underwent surgery for bilateral STN stimulation. The selection criteria were severe parkinsonian motor disability, clear response of symptoms to levodopa, occurrence of disabling levodopa-related motor complications and the absence of dementia and significant abnormalities on brain MRI. Clinical evaluation was performed 1 month before and 6 months after surgery. The improvement in the activities of daily living subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part II (UPDRS II) and parkinsonian motor disability (UPDRS III) was greater when the preoperative scores for activities of daily living and parkinsonian motor disability, in particular axial symptoms, such as gait disorders and postural instability assessed at the time of maximal clinical improvement (on drug), were lower. Age and disease duration were not predictive, but parkinsonian motor disability tended to be more improved in patients with younger age and shorter disease duration. The severity of levodopa-related motor complications was not a predictive factor. The outcome of STN stimulation was excellent in levodopa-responsive forms of Parkinson's disease, i.e. in patients with selective brain dopaminergic lesions, and moderate in patients with axial motor symptoms and cognitive impairment known to be less responsive or unresponsive to levodopa treatment, i.e. when brain non-dopaminergic lesions develop in addition to the degeneration of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system. The results are consistent with the classical inclusion criteria for STN stimulation, but imply that the decision to operate on the oldest patients and/or patients with gait and postural disorders, who are poorly responsive to levodopa, should be weighed carefully.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awf050

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 426

Metadata

Authors
Welter, M. L., Houeto, J. L., Tezenas du Montcel, S., Mesnage, V., Bonnet, A. M., Pillon, B., Arnulf, I., Pidoux, B., Dormont, D., Cornu, P., & Agid, Y.
Venue
Brain
Published
2002-03-01
Volume
125
Issue
3
Pages
575-583
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2120756731
Cited by
426
References
2
FWCI
12.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical predictive factors of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awf050
The paper
Welter, M. L., Houeto, J. L., Tezenas du Montcel, S., Mesnage, V., Bonnet, A. M., Pillon, B., Arnulf, I., Pidoux, B., Dormont, D., Cornu, P., & Agid, Y. (2002). Clinical predictive factors of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf050

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.