The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motor and cognitive outcome in patients with Parkinson's disease 8 years after subthalamic implants
Open accessAbstract
Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus represents the most important innovation for treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease. Prospective studies have shown that although the beneficial effects of this procedure are maintained at 5 years, axial motor features and cognitive decline may occur in the long term after the implants. In order to address some unsolved questions raised by previous studies, we evaluated a series of 20 consecutive patients who received continuous stimulation for 8 years. The overall motor improvement reported at 5 years (55.5% at Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-motor part, P < 0.001 compared with baseline) was only partly retained 3 years later (39%, P < 0.001, compared with baseline; -16.5%, P < 0.01, compared with 5 years), with differential effects on motor features: speech did not improve and postural stability worsened (P < 0.05). The preoperative levodopa equivalent daily dose was reduced by 58.2% at 5 years and by 60.3% at 8 years. In spite of subtle worsening of motor features, a dramatic impairment in functional state (-56.6% at Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-Activities of Daily Living, P < 0.01) emerged after the fifth year of stimulation. The present study did not reveal a predictive value of preoperative levodopa response, whereas few single features at baseline (such as gait and postural stability motor scores and the preoperative levodopa equivalent daily dose) could predict long-term motor outcome. A decline in verbal fluency (slightly more pronounced than after 5 years) was detected after 8 years. A significant but slight decline in tasks of abstract reasoning, episodic memory and executive function was also found. One patient had developed dementia at 5 years with further progression at 8 years. Executive dysfunction correlated significantly with postural stability, suggesting interplay between axial motor deterioration and cognition. Eight years after surgery, no significant change was observed on scales assessing depression or anxiety when compared with baseline. At 8 years, there was no significant increase of side-effects when compared with 5-year follow-up. In conclusion, deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is a safe procedure with regard to cognitive and behavioural morbidity over long-term follow-up. However, the global benefit partly decreases later in the course of the disease, due to progression of Parkinson's disease and the appearance of medication- and stimulation-resistant symptoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hughes, A. J., Daniel, S. E., Kilford, L., & Lees, A. J. (1992) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181 · Cited by 10,378
A self-rating depression scale
ZUNG, W. W. K. (1965) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008 · Cited by 9,813 · cited 3×
“In addition, an evaluation of mood and anxiety by means of Zung’s self-rating depression scale (Zung, 1965) and self-rating anxiety scale (Zung, 1971), which can quantify symptoms of depression and anxiety, was carried out preoperatively and 8 years after implantation.”
A Rating Instrument For Anxiety Disorders
Zung, W. W. K. (1971) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(71)71479-0 · Cited by 4,578
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_184495 · Cited by 3,066
A Randomized Trial of Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease
Deuschl, G., Schade-Brittinger, C., Krack, P., Volkmann, J., Schäfer, H., Bötzel, K., Daniels, C., Deutschländer, A., Dillmann, U., Eisner, W., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa060281 · Cited by 2,944
Recent developments in Parkinson's disease
Fahn, S., Elton, R., MARSDEN, C. D., Calne, D. B., & Goldstein, M. (1986) · Raven Press eBooks · Cited by 2,306
Krack, P., Batir, A., Van Blercom, N., Chabardes, S., Fraix, V., Ardouin, C., Koudsie, A., Limousin, P. D., Benazzouz, A., LeBas, J. F., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa035275 · Cited by 2,249
Weaver, F. M. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2008.929 · Cited by 1,525
Effect on parkinsonian signs and symptoms of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation
Limousin, P., Pollak, P., Benazzouz, A., Hoffmann, D., Le Bas, J.-F., Perret, J. E., Benabid, A.-L., & Broussolle, E. (1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90062-4 · Cited by 1,392
Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: Summary and meta-analysis of outcomes
Kleiner-Fisman, G., Herzog, J., Fisman, D. N., Tamma, F., Lyons, K. E., Pahwa, R., Lang, A. E., & Deuschl, G. (2006) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.20962 · Cited by 957
Cited by
Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation
Herrington, T. M., Cheng, J. J., & Eskandar, E. N. (2016) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00281.2015 · Cited by 551
Ten-Year Outcome of Subthalamic Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: A Blinded Evaluation
Castrioto, A. (2011) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.182 · Cited by 455
Deep Brain Stimulation: A Paradigm Shifting Approach to Treat Parkinson's Disease
Hickey, P., & Stacy, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00173 · Cited by 125
Current applications and limitations of surgical treatments for movement disorders
Krack, P., Martinez‐Fernandez, R., del Alamo, M., & Obeso, J. A. (2017) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.26890 · Cited by 122
“…ND 54.4 59 74 66 Romito et al (2009)52 20 5 years 54.2 ND 80b1e ND 61.9 41 95 56.2 Moro et al (2010)53 35 5-6 years 50.5 ND 67a ND 46 30.8 81.1 59.1 Fasano et al (2010)54 20 8 years 39 ND ND ND 60.3 26.4 73 49 Zibetti et al (2011)55 14 >9 years 42 64% 65b ND 39 41.6 71.4 43.3 76.5e Castrioto et al…”
InfluentialThe safety of Micro-implants for the brain
Dabbour, A.-H., Tan, S., Kim, S. H., Guild, S.-J., Heppner, P., McCormick, D., Wright, B. E., Leung, D., Gallichan, R., Budgett, D., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.796203 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Fasano, A., Romito, L. M., Daniele, A., Piano, C., Zinno, M., Bentivoglio, A. R., & Albanese, A.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-08-27
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2664-2676
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2158886175
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 15.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motor and cognitive outcome in patients with Parkinson's disease 8 years after subthalamic implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awq221
- The paper
- Fasano, A., Romito, L. M., Daniele, A., Piano, C., Zinno, M., Bentivoglio, A. R., & Albanese, A. (2010). Motor and cognitive outcome in patients with Parkinson's disease 8 years after subthalamic implants. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.