The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke
Abstract
Hand movement recovery and cortical reorganization were studied in 10 subjects with chronic stroke using functional MRI (fMRI) before and after training with an intensive finger movement tracking programme. Subjects were assigned randomly to a treatment or control group. The treatment group received 18-20 sessions of finger tracking training using target waveforms under variable conditions. The control group crossed over to receive the same treatment after the control period. For comparison with a healthy population, nine well elderly females were also studied; however, the well elderly controls did not cross over after the control period. The dependent variables consisted of a Box and Block score to measure prehensile ability (subjects with stroke only), a tracking accuracy score and quantification of active cortical areas using fMRI. For the tracking tests, the subjects tracked a sine wave target on a computer screen with extension and flexion movements of the paretic index finger. Functional brain images were collected from the frontal and parietal lobes of the subject with a 4 tesla magnet. Areas of interest included the sensorimotor cortex (SMC), primary motor area (M1), primary sensory area (S1), premotor cortex (PMC) and supplementary motor area (SMA). Comparison between all subjects with stroke and all well elderly subjects at pre-test was analysed with two-sample t-tests. Change from pre-test to post-test within subjects was analysed with paired t-tests. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Stroke treatment subjects demonstrated significant improvement in tracking accuracy, whereas stroke control subjects did not until after crossover treatment. At pre-test, the cortical activation in the subjects with stroke was predominantly ipsilateral to the performing hand, whereas in the well elderly subjects it was contralateral. Activation for the stroke treatment group following training switched to contralateral in SMC, M1, S1 and PMC. The stroke control group's activation remained ipsilateral after the control period, but switched to contralateral after crossover to receive treatment. All well elderly subjects maintained predominantly contralateral activation throughout. Transfer of skill to functional activity was shown in significantly improved Box and Block scores for the stroke treatment group, with no such improvement in the stroke control group until after crossover. We concluded that individuals with chronic stroke receiving intensive tracking training showed improved tracking accuracy and grasp and release function, and that these improvements were accompanied by brain reorganization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning
Kami, A., Meyer, G., Jezzard, P., Adams, M. M., Turner, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377155a0 · Cited by 1,883
Winstein, C. J., Pohl, P. S., & Lewthwaite, R. (1994) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1994.10607635 · Cited by 264
Liu, Y., & Rouiller, E. M. (1999) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s002210050830 · Cited by 249
Yao, W.-X., Fischman, M. G., & Wang, Y. T. (1994) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1994.9941683 · Cited by 48
Cited by
The plastic human brain cortex
Pascual-Leone, A., Amedi, A., Fregni, F., & Merabet, L. B. (2005) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144216 · Cited by 1,929
Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications
Cramer, S. C., Sur, M., Dobkin, B. H., O'Brien, C., Sanger, T. D., Trojanowski, J. Q., Rumsey, J. M., Hicks, R., Cameron, J., Chen, D., et al. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr039 · Cited by 1,259
What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Veerbeek, J. M., van Wegen, E., van Peppen, R., van der Wees, P. J., Hendriks, E., Rietberg, M., & Kwakkel, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087987 · Cited by 1,203
Virtual Environments for Motor Rehabilitation: Review
Holden, M. K. (2005) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187 · Cited by 1,154
Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation
Daly, J. J., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70223-0 · Cited by 1,149
Metadata
- Authors
- Carey, J. R., Kimberley, T. J., Lewis, S. M., Auerbach, E. J., Dorsey, L., Rundquist, P., & Ugurbil, K.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 773-788
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2170852394
- Cited by
- 562
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 30.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awf091
- The paper
- Carey, J. R., Kimberley, T. J., Lewis, S. M., Auerbach, E. J., Dorsey, L., Rundquist, P., & Ugurbil, K. (2002). Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.