The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this study was to differentiate the effects of body load and joint movements on the leg muscle activation pattern during assisted locomotion in spinal man. Stepping movements were induced by a driven gait orthosis (DGO) on a treadmill in patients with complete para-/tetraplegia and, for comparison, in healthy subjects. All subjects were unloaded by 70% of their body weight. EMG of upper and lower leg muscles and joint movements of the DGO of both legs were recorded. In the patients, normal stepping movements and those mainly restricted to the hips (blocked knees) were associated with a pattern of leg muscle EMG activity that corresponded to that of the healthy subjects, but the amplitude was smaller. Locomotor movements restricted to imposed ankle joint movements were followed by no, or only focal EMG responses in the stretched muscles. Unilateral locomotion in the patients was associated with a normal pattern of leg muscle EMG activity restricted to the moving side, while in the healthy subjects a bilateral activation occurred. This indicates that interlimb coordination depends on a supraspinal input. During locomotion with 100% body unloading in healthy subjects and patients, no EMG activity was present. Thus, it can be concluded that afferent input from hip joints, in combination with that from load receptors, plays a crucial role in the generation of locomotor activity in the isolated human spinal cord. This is in line with observations from infant stepping experiments and experiments in cats. Afferent feedback from knee and ankle joints may be involved largely in the control of focal movements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Response to sudden torques about ankle in man: myotatic reflex
Gottlieb, G. L., & Agarwal, G. C. (1979) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1979.42.1.91 · Cited by 386
Cited by
Patient- cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results
Riener, R., Lunenburger, L., Jezernik, S., Anderschitz, M., Colombo, G., & Dietz, V. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2005.848628 · Cited by 729
Self-citationClark, D. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00246 · Cited by 441
Husemann, B., Müller, F., Krewer, C., Heller, S., & Koenig, E. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000254607.48765.cb · Cited by 418
Mayr, A., Kofler, M., Quirbach, E., Matzak, H., Fröhlich, K., & Saltuari, L. (2007) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968307300697 · Cited by 371
Alterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking
Hidler, J. M., & Wall, A. E. (2005) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.09.016 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Dietz, V.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2626-2634
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2148039809
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awf273
- The paper
- Dietz, V. (2002). Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.