Cited by 729Prosthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Patient- cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results

Riener, R., Lunenburger, L., Jezernik, S., Anderschitz, M., Colombo, G., Dietz, V.·2005·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

Task-oriented repetitive movements can improve motor performance in patients with neurological or orthopaedic lesions. The application of robotics and automation technology can serve to assist, enhance, evaluate, and document neurological and orthopedic rehabilitation. This paper deals with the application of "patient-cooperative" techniques to robot-aided gait rehabilitation of neurological disorders. We define patient-cooperative to mean that, during movement, the technical system takes into account the patient's intention and voluntary efforts rather than imposing any predefined movements or inflexible strategies. It is hypothesized that such cooperative robotic approaches can improve the therapeutic outcome compared to classical rehabilitation strategies. New cooperative strategies are presented that detect the patient's voluntary efforts. First, this enables the patient increased freedom of movement by a certain amount of robot compliance. Second, the robot behavior adapts to the existing voluntary motor abilities. And third, the robotic system displays and improves the patient contribution by visual biofeedback. Initial experimental results are presented to evaluate the basic principle and technical function of proposed approaches. Further improvements of the technical design and additional clinical testing is required to prove whether the therapeutic outcome can be enhanced by such cooperative strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2005.848628

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In traditional rehabilitation therapies, intensive labour is involved and physical therapists have to provide highly repetitive training that is usually inefficient.

    “In the traditional rehabilitation therapies, intensive labour should be involved, and physical therapists have to provide the patients with highly repetitive training that is usually inefficient [25].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riener, R., Lunenburger, L., Jezernik, S., Anderschitz, M., Colombo, G., & Dietz, V.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Universitätsklinik Balgrist (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2005-09
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
380-394
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W2133322641
Cited by
729
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 39
FWCI
14.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
treadmill training, robot compliance, adaptive robot behavior, visual biofeedback, neurorehabilitation, motor recovery
MeSH terms
Exercise Test, Humans, Leg, Pilot Projects, Robotics, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface, Motion Therapy, Continuous Passive, Treatment Outcome, Gait Disorders, Neurologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review