The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy
Open accessAbstract
Motor rehabilitation therapy is commonly employed after strokes, but outcomes are variable and there is little specific information about the changes in brain activity that are associated with improved function. We performed serial functional MRI (fMRI) on a group of seven patients receiving a form of rehabilitation therapy after stroke in order to characterize functional changes in the brain that correlate with behavioural improvements. Patients were scanned while performing a hand flexion-extension movement twice before and twice after a two-week home-based therapy programme combining restraint of the unaffected limb with progressive exercises for the affected limb. As expected, the extent of improvement in hand function after therapy varied between patients. Therapy-related improvements in hand function correlated with increases in fMRI activity in the premotor cortex and secondary somatosensory cortex contralateral to the affected hand, and in superior posterior regions of the cerebellar hemispheres bilaterally (Crus I and lobule VI). fMRI offers a promising, objective approach for specifically identifying changes in brain activity potentially responsible for rehabilitation-mediated recovery of function after stroke. Our results suggest that activity changes in sensorimotor regions are associated with successful motor rehabilitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910330508 · Cited by 3,202
Nudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F., & Milliken, G. W. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5269.1791 · Cited by 1,911
Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action
Jueptner, M., Stephan, K. M., Frith, C. D., Brooks, D. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Passingham, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1997.77.3.1313 · Cited by 624
Liu, Y., & Rouiller, E. M. (1999) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s002210050830 · Cited by 249
Cited by
Virtual Environments for Motor Rehabilitation: Review
Holden, M. K. (2005) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187 · Cited by 1,154
Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation
Daly, J. J., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70223-0 · Cited by 1,149
Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: Facts and theories
Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B., & Lindeman, E. (2004) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-2004-00282 · Cited by 727
Motor Imagery: A Backdoor to the Motor System After Stroke?
Sharma, N., Pomeroy, V. M., & Baron, J.-C. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000226902.43357.fc · Cited by 688
Mechanisms Underlying Recovery of Motor Function After Stroke
Ward, N. S., & Cohen, L. G. (2004) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.61.12.1844 · Cited by 665
Metadata
- Authors
- Johansen‐Berg, H., Dawes, H., Guy, C., Smith, S. M., Wade, D. T., & Matthews, P. M.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2731-2742
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2154898926
- Cited by
- 558
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 29.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awf282
- The paper
- Johansen‐Berg, H., Dawes, H., Guy, C., Smith, S. M., Wade, D. T., & Matthews, P. M. (2002). Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf282
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.