The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Central neuromodulation in chronic migraine patients with suboccipital stimulators: a PET study
Abstract
Electrical stimulation of primary sensory afferents is known to have an antinociceptive effect. Animal and functional imaging studies suggest a role for supraspinal structures in this response. Eight patients with chronic migraine (> or =15 days per month of attacks of migraine without aura), who had shown a marked beneficial response to implanted bilateral suboccipital stimulators, were studied. Stimulation evoked local paraesthesia, the presence of which was a criterion of pain relief. On stimulation, the headache began to improve instantaneously and was completely suppressed within 30 min. On switching off the stimulation, the headache recurred instantly and peaked within 20 min. PET scans were performed using regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) as a marker of neuronal activity. Each patient was scanned in the following three states: (1) stimulator at optimum settings: patient pain-free but with paraesthesia; (2) stimulator off: patient in pain and no paraesthesia; (3) stimulator partially activated: patient with intermediate levels of pain and paraesthesia. All scans were processed and analysed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) 99. There were significant changes in rCBF in the dorsal rostral pons, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and cuneus, correlated to pain scores, and in the ACC and left pulvinar, correlated to stimulation-induced paraesthesia scores. The activation pattern in the dorsal rostral pons is highly suggestive of a role for this structure in the pathophysiology of chronic migraine. The localization and persistence of activity during stimulation is exactly consistent with a region activated in episodic migraine, and with the persistence of activation of that area after successful treatment. The dorsal rostral pons may be a locus of neuromodulation by suboccipital stimulation. In addition, suboccipital stimulation modulated activity in the left pulvinar.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diener, H.-C., Bussone, G., Oene, J. V., Lahaye, M., Schwalen, S., & Goadsby, P. (2007) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01326.x · Cited by 561
Saper, J. R., Dodick, D. W., Silberstein, S. D., McCarville, S., Sun, M., & Goadsby, P. J. (2011) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1177/0333102410381142 · Cited by 425
A Positron Emission Tomographic Study in Spontaneous Migraine
Afridi, S. K., Giffin, N. J., Kaube, H., Friston, K. J., Ward, N. S., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Goadsby, P. J. (2005) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.62.8.1270 · Cited by 417
Fumal, A., Laureys, S., Di Clemente, L., Boly, M., Bohotin, V., Vandenheede, M., Coppola, G., Salmon, E., Kupers, R., & Schoenen, J. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh691 · Cited by 299
Silberstein, S. D., Dodick, D. W., Saper, J., Huh, B., Slavin, K. V., Sharan, A., Reed, K., Narouze, S., Mogilner, A., Goldstein, J., et al. (2012) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1177/0333102412462642 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Matharu, M. S.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 220-230
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2169186856
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Central neuromodulation in chronic migraine patients with suboccipital stimulators: a PET study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awh022
- The paper
- Matharu, M. S. (2004). Central neuromodulation in chronic migraine patients with suboccipital stimulators: a PET study. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.