Cited by 106Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

The functional anatomy of divided attention in amnestic mild cognitive impairment

Dannhauser, Thomas M., Walker, Zuzana, Stevens, Tim, Lee, Lean, Seal, Marc, Shergill, Sukhwinder S.·2005·Brain

Abstract

Recent neuroimaging studies have demonstrated changes in brain function in cognitively normal subjects at increased risk of developing Alzheimer's disease. Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (AMCI) carries a high risk of developing into Alzheimer's disease. In AMCI altered cortical activation has been demonstrated during memory tasks, using functional MRI (fMRI). Memory and attention are closely related cognitive functions. It is unclear whether the memory impairment of AMCI is associated with attentional deficits of the sort likely to be revealed by tasks requiring divided attention. Ten older adults (mean age 72 years, range 57-81 years) with AMCI were compared with healthy matched controls on divided attention and passive sensory processing tasks using fMRI. During the divided attention task both groups activated similar regions of left hemispheric prefrontal and extrastriate visual cortex. However, the AMCI group had attenuated prefrontal activation compared with age matched controls. On the passive sensory processing task there was no difference between the AMCI and control groups. We conclude that there are changes in the functional network subserving divided attention in patients with AMCI as reflected in the attenuation of prefrontal cortical activation. These findings have implications for evaluating cognition in AMCI and also for monitoring the effects of future treatments in AMCI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awh413

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dannhauser, T. M., Walker, Z., Stevens, T., Lee, L., Seal, M., & Shergill, S. S.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Dannhauser, Thomas M.
Venue
Brain
Published
2005-02-10
Volume
128
Issue
6
Pages
1418-1427
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2151805481
Cited by
106
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
amnestic mild cognitive impairment, divided attention, prefrontal cortex activation, attention deficits, Alzheimer's disease risk, memory impairment, older adults, extrastriate cortex, functional brain networks
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Amnesia, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Visual Cortex, Prefrontal Cortex, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review