The functional anatomy of divided attention in amnestic mild cognitive impairment
Abstract
Recent neuroimaging studies have demonstrated changes in brain function in cognitively normal subjects at increased risk of developing Alzheimer's disease. Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (AMCI) carries a high risk of developing into Alzheimer's disease. In AMCI altered cortical activation has been demonstrated during memory tasks, using functional MRI (fMRI). Memory and attention are closely related cognitive functions. It is unclear whether the memory impairment of AMCI is associated with attentional deficits of the sort likely to be revealed by tasks requiring divided attention. Ten older adults (mean age 72 years, range 57-81 years) with AMCI were compared with healthy matched controls on divided attention and passive sensory processing tasks using fMRI. During the divided attention task both groups activated similar regions of left hemispheric prefrontal and extrastriate visual cortex. However, the AMCI group had attenuated prefrontal activation compared with age matched controls. On the passive sensory processing task there was no difference between the AMCI and control groups. We conclude that there are changes in the functional network subserving divided attention in patients with AMCI as reflected in the attenuation of prefrontal cortical activation. These findings have implications for evaluating cognition in AMCI and also for monitoring the effects of future treatments in AMCI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The PFC is critically involved in guiding behavior during divided attention and working memory tasks, as well as in planning and decision making.
“Extensive research and recent imaging studies have shown that the PFC is critically involved in guiding behavior during divided attention (Nebel et al. [364]; Dannhauser et al. [365]) and working memory (Goldman-Rakic [366]; Adcock et al. [367]; Taylor et al. [368]; Marshuetz and Smith [369]; Müller and Knight [370]; Curtis [371]) tasks, as well as in planning (Rowe et al. [372]; Anderson et al. [”
From The Temporal Dynamics Model of Emotional Memory Processing: A Synthesis on the Neurobiological Basis of Stress-Induced Amnesia, Flashbulb and Traumatic Memories, and the Yerkes-Dodson Law (2007) · cites this paper as Dannhauser et al. [365]
Cites
Arnold, S. E., Hyman, B. T., Flory, J., Damasio, A. R., & Van Hoesen, G. W. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.103 · Cited by 1,380 · see citing works
Grundman, M. (2004) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.61.1.59 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Morris, J. C., McKeel, D. W., Storandt, M., Rubin, E. H., Price, J. L., Grant, E. A., Ball, M. J., & Berg, L. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.4.469 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Selective changes of resting-state networks in individuals at risk for Alzheimer’s disease
Sorg, C., Riedl, V., Mühlau, M., Calhoun, V. D., Eichele, T., Läer, L., Drzezga, A., Förstl, H., Kurz, A., Zimmer, C., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0708803104 · Cited by 1,036 · see citing works
Diamond, D. M., Campbell, A. M., Park, C. R., Halonen, J., & Zoladz, P. R. (2007) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2007/60803 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
“[365]) and working memory (Goldman-Rakic [366]; Adcock et al.”
BackgroundKoch, K., Myers, N. E., Göttler, J., Pasquini, L., Grimmer, T., Förster, S., Manoliu, A., Neitzel, J., Kurz, A., Förstl, H., et al. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu151 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dannhauser, T. M., Walker, Z., Stevens, T., Lee, L., Seal, M., & Shergill, S. S.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dannhauser, Thomas M.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-02-10
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1418-1427
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2151805481
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- amnestic mild cognitive impairment, divided attention, prefrontal cortex activation, attention deficits, Alzheimer's disease risk, memory impairment, older adults, extrastriate cortex, functional brain networks
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Amnesia, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Visual Cortex, Prefrontal Cortex, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review