The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A PET study exploring the laterality of brainstem activation in migraine using glyceryl trinitrate
Abstract
Migraine is a common disabling condition likely to be associated with dysfunction of brain pathways involved in pain and other sensory modalities. A cardinal, indeed signature, feature of the disorder that led to its name is that the pain may be lateralized. H(2)15O-labelled PET was used to study 24 migraineurs and eight healthy controls. The migraineurs were divided into three groups according to the site of their headache: right, left or bilateral. In each group, a migraine was induced using a glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) infusion. The subjects were scanned at predefined points: pre-infusion, during GTN, during migraine and post-migraine. SPM99 software was used to analyse the data. Significant brainstem activation was seen in the dorsal lateral pons (P < 0.05 after small volume correction) during the migraine state versus the pain-free state when comparing migraineurs with controls. When each group was analysed separately, to investigate laterality, it was found that the dorsal pontine activation was ipsilateral in the right-sided and left-sided groups and bilateral in the bilateral headache group with a left-sided preponderance. Consistent with previous work, the activation persisted after pain was controlled by sumatriptan. These results suggest that lateralization of pain in migraine is due to lateralized brain dysfunction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prevalence and Burden of Migraine in the United States: Data From the American Migraine Study II
Lipton, R. B., Stewart, W. F., Diamond, S., Diamond, M. L., & Reed, M. (2001) · Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041007646.x · Cited by 2,268
Cited by
Pathophysiology of migraine: a disorder of sensory processing
Goadsby, P. J., Holland, P. R., Martins-Oliveira, M., Hoffmann, J., Schankin, C., & Akerman, S. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00034.2015 · Cited by 1,998
Amin, F. M., Asghar, M. S., Hougaard, A., Hansen, A. E., Larsen, V. A., de Koning, P. J., Larsson, H. B., Olesen, J., & Ashina, M. (2013) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70067-x · Cited by 295
The Insula: A “Hub of Activity” in Migraine
Borsook, D., Veggeberg, R., Erpelding, N., Borra, R., Linnman, C., Burstein, R., & Becerra, L. (2016) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858415601369 · Cited by 146
Gut microbiota dysbiosis enhances migraine-like pain via TNFα upregulation
Tang, Y., Liu, S., Shu, H., Yanagisawa, L., & Tao, F. (2020) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-019-01721-7 · Cited by 88
Rizatriptan reduces vestibular-induced motion sickness in migraineurs
Furman, J. M., Marcus, D. A., & Balaban, C. D. (2011) · The Journal of Headache and Pain · doi:10.1007/s10194-010-0250-z · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Afridi, S. K.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-02-02
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 932-939
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2028248974
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A PET study exploring the laterality of brainstem activation in migraine using glyceryl trinitrate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awh416
- The paper
- Afridi, S. K. (2005). A PET study exploring the laterality of brainstem activation in migraine using glyceryl trinitrate. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh416
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.