The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cross-modal reorganization and speech perception in cochlear implant users
Abstract
Recent work suggests that once the auditory cortex of deaf persons has been reorganized by cross-modal plasticity, it can no longer respond to signals from a cochlear implant (CI) installed subsequently. To further examine this issue, we compared the evoked potentials involved in the processing of visual stimuli between CI users and hearing controls. The stimuli were concentric circles replaced by a different overlapping shape, inducing a shape transformation, known to activate the ventral visual pathway in human adults. All CI users had their device implanted for >1 year, but obtained different levels of auditory performance following training to establish language comprehension. Seven of the 13 patients showed good capacities for speech recognition with the CI (good performers) while the six others demonstrated poor speech recognition abilities (poor performers). The evoked potentials of all patients showed larger amplitudes, with different distributions of scalp activations between the two groups. The poor performers exhibited broader, anteriorly distributed, high P2 amplitudes over the cortex whereas the good performers showed significantly higher P2 amplitudes over visual occipital areas. These results suggest the existence of a profound cross-modal reorganization in the poor performers and an intramodal reorganization in the good performers. We interpret these data on the basis of enhanced audiovisual coupling as the key to a long-term functional improvement in speech discrimination in CI users.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Critical periods in speech perception: New directions
Werker, J. F., & Hensch, T. K. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015104 · Cited by 774
Blamey, P., Artieres, F., Başkent, D., Bergeron, F., Beynon, A., Burke, E., Dillier, N., Dowell, R., Fraysse, B., Gallégo, S., et al. (2013) · Audiology and Neurotology · doi:10.1159/000343189 · Cited by 676
Self-citationCross-modal plasticity for the spatial processing of sounds in visually deprived subjects
Collignon, O., Voss, P., Lassonde, M., & Lepore, F. (2009) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1553-z · Cited by 286
Self-citationLong-lasting crossmodal cortical reorganization triggered by brief postnatal visual deprivation
Collignon, O., Dormal, G., de Heering, A., Lepore, F., Lewis, T. L., & Maurer, D. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.036 · Cited by 94
Is there a future for sensory substitution outside academic laboratories?
Elli, G. V., Benetti, S., & Collignon, O. (2014) · Multisensory Research · doi:10.1163/22134808-00002460 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Doucet, M. E., Bergeron, F., Lassonde, M., Ferron, P., & Lepore, F.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-06-09
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3376-3383
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2129400109
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-modal reorganization and speech perception in cochlear implant users. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awl264
- The paper
- Doucet, M. E., Bergeron, F., Lassonde, M., Ferron, P., & Lepore, F. (2006). Cross-modal reorganization and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl264
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.