The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors Affecting Auditory Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: An Update with 2251 Patients
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To update a 15-year-old study of 800 postlinguistically deaf adult patients showing how duration of severe to profound hearing loss, age at cochlear implantation (CI), age at onset of severe to profound hearing loss, etiology and CI experience affected CI outcome. Study Design: Retrospective multicenter study. Methods: Data from 2251 adult patients implanted since 2003 in 15 international centers were collected and speech scores in quiet were converted to percentile ranks to remove differences between centers. Results: The negative effect of long duration of severe to profound hearing loss was less important in the new data than in 1996; the effects of age at CI and age at onset of severe to profound hearing loss were delayed until older ages; etiology had a smaller effect, and the effect of CI experience was greater with a steeper learning curve. Patients with longer durations of severe to profound hearing loss were less likely to improve with CI experience than patients with shorter duration of severe to profound hearing loss. Conclusions: The factors that were relevant in 1996 were still relevant in 2011, although their relative importance had changed. Relaxed patient selection criteria, improved clinical management of hearing loss, modifications of surgical practice, and improved devices may explain the differences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after “Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss
Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2845-09.2009 · Cited by 2,456
Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in the deaf
Finney, E. M., Fine, I., & Dobkins, K. R. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn763 · Cited by 643
Role of Electrode Placement as a Contributor to Variability in Cochlear Implant Outcomes
Finley, C. C., Holden, T. A., Holden, L. K., Whiting, B. R., Chole, R. A., Neely, G. J., Hullar, T. E., & Skinner, M. W. (2008) · Otology & Neurotology · doi:10.1097/mao.0b013e318184f492 · Cited by 549
Cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants
Lee, D. S., Lee, J. S., Oh, S. H., Kim, S.-K., Kim, J.-W., Chung, J.-K., Lee, M. C., & Kim, C. S. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051653 · Cited by 480
Clinical Findings for a Group of Infants and Young Children with Auditory Neuropathy
Rance, G., Beer, D. E., Cone-Wesson, B., Shepherd, R. K., Dowell, R. C., King, A. M., Rickards, F. W., & Clark, G. M. (1999) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-199906000-00006 · Cited by 460
Self-citationEvidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators
Rouger, J., Lagleyre, S., Fraysse, B., Deneve, S., Deguine, O., & Barone, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0609419104 · Cited by 301
Self-citationBeyond cochlear implants: awakening the deafened brain
Moore, D. R., & Shannon, R. V. (2009) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2326 · Cited by 248
Cross-modal reorganization and speech perception in cochlear implant users
Doucet, M. E., Bergeron, F., Lassonde, M., Ferron, P., & Lepore, F. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl264 · Cited by 245
Self-citationFraysse, B., Macías, Á. R., Sterkers, O., Burdo, S., Ramsden, R., Deguine, O., Klenzner, T., Lenarz, T., Rodriguez, M. M., Von Wallenberg, E., et al. (2006) · Otology & Neurotology · doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000226289.04048.0f · Cited by 237
Self-citationCortical Activity at Rest Predicts Cochlear Implantation Outcome
Lee, H.-J., Giraud, A.-L., Kang, E., Oh, S.-H., Kang, H., Kim, C.-S., & Lee, D. S. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl001 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Loizou, P. C. (1998) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.708543 · Cited by 326
Auditory cortical plasticity in cochlear implant users.
Glennon, E., Svirsky, M. A., & Froemke, R. C. (2020) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2019.11.003 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Blamey, P., Artieres, F., Başkent, D., Bergeron, F., Beynon, A., Burke, E., Dillier, N., Dowell, R., Fraysse, B., Gallégo, S., Govaerts, P. J., Green, K., Huber, A. M., Kleine-Punte, A., Maat, B., Marx, M., Mawman, D., Mosnier, I., O’Connor, A. F., O’Leary, S., Rousset, A., Schauwers, K., Skarzynski, H., Skarzynski, P. H., Sterkers, O., Terranti, A., Truy, E., Van de Heyning, P., Venail, F., Vincent, C., & Lazard, D. S.
- Venue
- Audiology and Neurotology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2012-10-19
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-47
- ISSN
- 1420-3030 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9700
- OpenAlex
- W2078908690
- Cited by
- 676
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors Affecting Auditory Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: An Update with 2251 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000343189
- The paper
- Blamey, P., Artieres, F., Başkent, D., Bergeron, F., Beynon, A., Burke, E., Dillier, N., Dowell, R., Fraysse, B., Gallégo, S., Govaerts, P. J., Green, K., Huber, A. M., Kleine-Punte, A., Maat, B., Marx, M., Mawman, D., Mosnier, I., O’Connor, A. F., . . . Lazard, D. S. (2013). Factors Affecting Auditory Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: An Update with 2251 Patients. Audiology and Neurotology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000343189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
