The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of frontal lobe epilepsy surgery
Abstract
Frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) surgery is the second most common surgery performed to treat pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Yet, little is known about long-term seizure outcome following frontal lobectomy. The aim of this study is to investigate the trends in longitudinal outcome and identify potential prognostic indicators in a cohort of FLE patients investigated using modern diagnostic techniques. We reviewed 70 patients who underwent a frontal lobectomy between 1995 and 2003 (mean follow-up 4.1 +/- 3 years). Data were analysed using survival analysis and multivariate regression with Cox proportional hazard models. A favourable outcome was defined as complete seizure-freedom, allowing for auras and seizures restricted to the first post-operative week. The estimated probability of complete seizure-freedom was 55.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 50-62] at 1 post-operative year, 45.1% (95% CI = 39-51) at 3 years, and 30.1% (95% CI = 21-39) at 5 years. Eighty per cent of seizure recurrences occurred within the first 6 post-operative months. Late remissions and relapses occurred, but were rare. After multivariate analysis, the following variables retained their significance as independent predictors of seizure recurrence: MRI-negative malformation of cortical development as disease aetiology [risk ratio (RR) = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.40-3.47], any extrafrontal MRI abnormality (RR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.12-2.69), generalized/non-localized ictal EEG patterns (RR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.15-2.87), occurrence of acute post-operative seizures (RR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.50-3.14) and incomplete surgical resection (RR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.66-4.05) (log likelihood-ratio test P-value < 0.0001). More than half of patients in favourable prognostic categories were seizure-free at 3 years, and up to 40% were seizure-free at 5 years, compared to <15% in those with unfavourable outcome predictors. These data underscore the importance of appropriate selection of potential surgical candidates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intractable epilepsy: management and therapeutic alternatives
Schuele, S. U., & Lüders, H. O. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70108-x · Cited by 344
Stereoelectroencephalography in presurgical assessment of MRI-negative epilepsy
McGonigal, A., Bartolomei, F., Regis, J., Guye, M., Gavaret, M., Fonseca, A. T.-D., Dufour, H., Figarella-Branger, D., Girard, N., Peragut, J.-C., et al. (2007) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awm218 · Cited by 290
FDG-PET improves surgical outcome in negative MRI Taylor-type focal cortical dysplasias
Chassoux, F., Rodrigo, S., Semah, F., Beuvon, F., Landre, E., Devaux, B., Turak, B., Mellerio, C., Meder, J.-F., Roux, F.-X., et al. (2010) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31820203a9 · Cited by 279
Advances in MRI for 'cryptogenic' epilepsies
Bernasconi, A., Bernasconi, N., Bernhardt, B. C., & Schrader, D. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.199 · Cited by 233
Rostampour, M., Hashemi, H., Najibi, S. M., & Oghabian, M. A. (2018) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.03.005 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeha, L. E., Najm, I., Bingaman, W., Dinner, D., Widdess-Walsh, P., & Luders, H.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-02-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 574-584
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2055946462
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of frontal lobe epilepsy surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awl364
- The paper
- Jeha, L. E., Najm, I., Bingaman, W., Dinner, D., Widdess-Walsh, P., & Luders, H. (2007). Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of frontal lobe epilepsy surgery. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl364
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.