The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FDG-PET improves surgical outcome in negative MRI Taylor-type focal cortical dysplasias
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of ¹⁸FDG-PET in a recent series of patients operated for intractable partial epilepsy associated with histologically proven Taylor-type focal cortical dysplasia (TTFCD) and negative MRI. METHODS: Of 23 consecutive patients (12 male, 7-38 years old) with negative 1.5-Tesla MRI, 10 exhibited subtle nonspecific abnormalities (e.g., unusual sulcus depth or gyral pattern) and the 13 others had strictly normal MRI. FDG-PET was analyzed both visually after coregistration on MRI and using SPM5 software. Metabolic data were compared with the epileptogenic zone (EZ) determined by stereo-EEG (SEEG) and surgical outcome. RESULTS: Visual PET analysis disclosed a focal or regional hypometabolism in 18 cases (78%) corresponding to a single gyrus (n = 9) or a larger cortical region (n = 9). PET/MRI coregistration detected a partially hypometabolic gyrus in 4 additional cases. SPM5 PET analysis (n = 18) was concordant with visual analysis in 13 cases. Location of PET abnormalities was extratemporal in all cases, involving eloquent cortex in 15 (65%). Correlations between SEEG, PET/MRI, and histologic findings (n = 20) demonstrated that single hypometabolic gyri (n = 11) corresponded to EZ and TTFCD, which was localized at the bottom of the sulcus. Larger hypometabolic areas (n = 9) also included the EZ and the dysplastic cortex but were more extensive. Following limited cortical resection (mean follow-up 4 years), seizure freedom without permanent motor deficit was obtained in 20/23 patients (87%). CONCLUSIONS: ¹⁸FDG-PET coregistered with MRI is highly sensitive to detect TTFCD and greatly improves diagnosis and surgical prognosis of patients with negative MRI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Focal dysplasia of the cerebral cortex in epilepsy
Taylor, D. C., Falconer, M. A., Bruton, C. J., & Corsellis, J. A. N. (1971) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.34.4.369 · Cited by 1,073
Terminology and classification of the cortical dysplasias
Palmini, A., Najm, I., Avanzini, G., Babb, T., Guerrini, R., Foldvary-Schaefer, N., Jackson, G., Lüders, H. O., Prayson, R., Spreafico, R., et al. (2004) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000114507.30388.7e · Cited by 945
Focal cortical dysplasia: neuropathological subtypes, EEG, neuroimaging and surgical outcome
Tassi, L. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf175 · Cited by 666
Chugani, H. T., Shields, W. D., Shewmon, D. A., Olson, D. M., Phelps, M. E., & Peacock, W. J. (1990) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410270408 · Cited by 614
Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of frontal lobe epilepsy surgery
Jeha, L. E., Najm, I., Bingaman, W., Dinner, D., Widdess-Walsh, P., & Luders, H. (2007) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl364 · Cited by 402
Chassoux, F. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.8.1733 · Cited by 391
Self-citationLerner, J. T., Salamon, N., Hauptman, J. S., Velasco, T. R., Hemb, M., Wu, J. Y., Sankar, R., Donald Shields, W., Engel Jr, J., Fried, I., et al. (2009) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01998.x · Cited by 390
Incomplete resection of focal cortical dysplasia is the main predictor of poor postsurgical outcome
Krsek, P., Maton, B., Jayakar, P., Dean, P., Korman, B., Rey, G., Dunoyer, C., Pacheco-Jacome, E., Morrison, G., Ragheb, J., et al. (2009) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000334365.22854.d3 · Cited by 325
FDG-PET/MRI coregistration improves detection of cortical dysplasia in patients with epilepsy
Salamon, N., Kung, J. S., Shaw, S. J., Koo, J., Koh, S., Wu, J. Y., Lerner, J. T., Sankar, R., Shields, W. D., Engel, J., et al. (2008) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000334752.41807.2f · Cited by 323
Different features of histopathological subtypes of pediatric focal cortical dysplasia
Krsek, P., Maton, B., Korman, B., Pacheco‐Jacome, E., Jayakar, P., Dunoyer, C., Rey, G., Morrison, G., Ragheb, J., Vinters, H. V., et al. (2008) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21398 · Cited by 303
Cited by
Sone, D., Sato, N., Ota, M., Maikusa, N., Kimura, Y., & Matsuda, H. (2018) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.09.017 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Chassoux, F., Rodrigo, S., Semah, F., Beuvon, F., Landre, E., Devaux, B., Turak, B., Mellerio, C., Meder, J.-F., Roux, F.-X., Daumas-Duport, C., Merlet, P., Dulac, O., & Chiron, C.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2010-12-14
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2168-2175
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W1991950182
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FDG-PET improves surgical outcome in negative MRI Taylor-type focal cortical dysplasias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e31820203a9
- The paper
- Chassoux, F., Rodrigo, S., Semah, F., Beuvon, F., Landre, E., Devaux, B., Turak, B., Mellerio, C., Meder, J.-F., Roux, F.-X., Daumas-Duport, C., Merlet, P., Dulac, O., & Chiron, C. (2010). FDG-PET improves surgical outcome in negative MRI Taylor-type focal cortical dysplasias. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e31820203a9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.