Prognostic factors and disease course in aquaporin-4 antibody-positive patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder from the United Kingdom and Japan
Abstract
Neuromyelitis optica and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders have been recently associated with the disease-specific autoantibody aquaporin-4, thought to be pathogenic. Identifying this antibody has allowed the clinical phenotype to be broadened. It is clear that some patients with similar clinical features do not have this antibody and may have a different condition with different outcomes and prognosis. Previous clinical neuromyelitis optica and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder studies have included such patients. We investigated clinical outcomes and prognostic characteristics of 106 aquaporin-4 antibody-seropositive patients from the UK and Japan. We looked at predictors of disability outcomes, namely visual disability (permanent bilateral visual loss with visual acuity of <6/36 in the best eye), motor disability (permanent inability to walk further than 100 m unaided), wheelchair dependence and mortality. Data were collected largely retrospectively through review of case records. After median disease duration of 75 months, 18% had developed permanent bilateral visual disability, 34% permanent motor disability, 23% had become wheelchair dependent and 9% had died. Age at disease onset appeared to be an important predictor of disability type. Young-onset patients in the UK, but not the Japanese cohort, commonly presenting with optic neuritis, had a high risk of visual disability while older patients in both cohorts had a high risk of motor disability, regardless of their onset symptom. Genetic factors also appeared important. The UK cohort seemed to have more severe disease than the Japanese cohort, with more severe onset attacks, a higher relapse frequency and greater disability at follow-up, despite earlier immunosuppression. Moreover, within the UK cohort, there were important differences between ethnic groups, with Afro-Caribbean patients having a younger age at disease onset, more brain and multifocal attacks and higher likelihood of visual disability than Caucasian patients. Thus, age at disease onset and genetic factors are both likely to be important in determining clinical outcomes in aquaporin-4 disease. This has important implications for interpreting clinical neuromyelitis optica and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder studies, since clinical features and outcomes appear not to be generic across populations and may need to be tailored to individual groups. These factors need to be explored further in future prospective neuromyelitis optica and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder studies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Diagnostic criteria for NMOSD have recently been updated.
“Diagnostic criteria for NMOSD have recently been updated (Supplementary Panel 2 ).47”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [47]
The References list revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica (NMO) from 2006. But the Discussion says incorporating broader NMO spectrum disorder phenotypes into those criteria still needs debate; it does not report an update to NMOSD diagnostic criteria. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMost patients with NMOSD have a relapsing course with accumulation of disability over time related to poor recovery from individual attacks and a secondary progressive course is rare.
“Most patients with NMOSD have a relapsing course with accumulation of disability over time related to poor recovery from individual attacks and a secondary progressive course is rare.45,47”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [47]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Adoni T, Lino A, da Gama P, Apostolos-Pereira S, Marchiori P, Kok F, et al. Recurrent neuromyelitis optica in Brazilian patients: clinical, im- munological, and neuroimaging characteristics. Mult Scler 2010; 16: 81-6.
- Akman-Demir G, Tu ¨zu ¨n E, Waters P, Icoz S, Kurtuncu M, Jarius S, et al. Prognostic implications of aquaporin-4 antibody status in neuromyelitis optica patients. J Neurol 2011; 258: 464-70.
- Bichuetti D, Oliveira E, Souza N, Rivero R, Gabbai A. Neuromyelitis optica in Brazil: a study on clinical and prognostic factors. Mult Scler 2009; 15: 613-9.
- Bizzoco E, Lolli F, Repice A, Hakiki B, Falcini M, Barilaro A, et al. Prevalence of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and phenotype distribution. J Neurol 2009; 256: 1891-8.
- Cabrera-Gomez J, Bonnan M, Gonzalez-Quevedo A, Saiz-Hinarejos A, Marignier R, Olindo S, et al. Neuromyelitis optica positive antibodies confer a worse course in relapsing-neuromyelitis optica in Cuba and French West Indies. Mult Scler 2009a; 15: 828-33.
- Cabrera-Gomez J, Kurtzke J, Gonzalez-Quevedo A, Lara-Rodriguez R. An epidemiological study of neuromyelitis optica in Cuba. J Neurol 2009b; 256: 35-44.
- Cabre P, Gonzalez-Quevedo A, Bonnan M, Saiz A, Olindo S, Graus F, et al. Relapsing neuromyelitis optica: long term history and clinical predictors of death. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 1162-4.
- Cabre P, Heinzlef O, Merle H, Buisson G, Bera O, Bellance R, et al. MS and neuromyelitis optica in Martinique (French West Indies). Neurology 2001; 56: 507-14.
- Collongues N, Marignier R, Zephir H, Papeix C, Blanc F, Ritleng C, et al. Neuromyelitis optica in France. A multicenter study of 125 patients. Neurology 2010; 74: 736-42.
- Collongues N, Cabre P, Marignier R, Zephir H, Papeix C, Audoin B, et al. A benign form of neuromyelitis optica: does it exist? Arch Neurol 2011a; 68: 918-24.
- Collongues N, Marignier R, Ze ´phir H, Blanc F, Vukusic S, Outteryck O, et al. High-risk syndrome for neuromyelitis optica: a descriptive and comparative study. Mult Scler 2011b; 17: 720-4.
- Devic E. Myelitis subaigue compliquee de nevrite optique. Bull Med 1894; 8: 1033-4.
- De Seze J, Stojkovic T, Ferriby D, Gauvrit JY, Montagne C, Mounier- Vehier F, et al. Devic's neuromyelitis optica: clinical, laboratory, MRI and outcome profile. J Neurol Sci 2002; 197: 57-61.
- Ghezzi A, Bergamaschi R, Martinelli V, Trojano M, Tola M, Merelli E, et al. Clinical characteristics, course and prognosis of relapsing Devic's neuromyelitis optica. J Neurol 2004; 251: 47-52.
- Jarius S, Franciotta D, Bergamaschi R, Wright H, Littleton E, Palace J, et al. NMO-IgG in the diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 2007; 68: 1076-7.
- Kanamori Y, Nakashima I, Takai Y, Nishiyama S, Kuroda H, Takahasi T, et al. Pain in neuromyelitis optica and its effect on quality of life. A cross-sectional study. Neurology 2011; 77: 652-8.
- Kanzaki M, Mochizuki H, Ogawa G, Tanaka K, Araki M, Motoyoshi K, et al. Clinical features of opticospinal multiple sclerosis with anti-aquaporin 4 antibody. Eur Neurol 2008; 60: 37-42.
- Lennon V, Kryzer T, Pittock S, Verkman A, Hinson S. IgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel. J Exp Med 2005; 202: 473-7.
- Lennon V, Wingerchuk D, Kryzer T, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti C, Fujihara K, et al. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2004; 364: 2106-12.
- Matiello M, Lennon V, Jacob A, Pittock S, Lucchinetti C, Wingerchuk D, et al. NMO-IgG predicts the outcome of recurrent optic neuritis. Neurology 2008; 70: 2197-200.
- Merle H, Olindo S, Bonnan M, Donnio A, Richer R, Smadja D, et al. Natural history of the visual impairment of relapsing neuromyelitis optica. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 810-5.
- Nagaishi A, Takagi M, Umemura A, Tanaka M, Kitagawa Y, Matsui M, et al. Clinical features of neuromyelitis optica in a large Japanese cohort: comparison between phenotypes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2011; 82: 1360-4.
- Nakashima I, Fujihara K, Miyazawa I, Misu T, Narikawa K, Nakamura M, et al. Clinical and MRI features of Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis positive for NMO-IgG. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006; 77: 1073-5.
- O'Riordan J, Gallagher H, Thompson A, Howard R, Kingsley D, Thompson E, et al. Clinical, CSF and MRI findings in Devic's neuro- myelitis optica. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996; 60: 382-7.
- Papais-Alvarenga R, Miranda-Santos C, Puccioni-Sohler M, de Almeida A, Oliveira S, Basilio de Oliveira C, et al. Optic neuromyelitis syndrome in Brazilian patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73: 429-35.
- Rivera J, Kurtzke J, Booth V, Corona V. Characteristics of Devic's disease (neuromyelitis optica) in Mexico. J Neurol 2008; 255: 710-5.
- Sahraian M, Moinfar Z, Khorramnia S, Ebrahim M. Relapsing neuromye- litis optica: demographic and clinical features in Iranian patients. Eur J Neurol 2010; 17: 794-9.
- Scalfari A, Neuhaus A, Daumer M, Ebers G, Muraro P. Age and disability accumulation in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2011; 77: 1246-52.
- Takahashi T, Fujihara K, Nakashima I, Misu T, Miyazawa I, Nakamura M, et al. Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody is involved in the pathogenesis of NMO: a study on antibody titre. Brain 2007; 130: 1235-43.
- Waters P, Jarius S, Littleton E, Leite M, Jacob S, Gray B, et al. Aquaporin-4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica and longitudinally ex- tensive transverse myelitis. Arch Neurol 2008; 65: 913-9.
- Waters P, McKeon A, Leite M, Rajasekharan S, Lennon V, Villalobos A, et al. Serological diagnosis of NMO: a multicentre comparison of aquaporin-4-IgG assays. Neurology 2012; 78: 665-71.
- Weinshenker B, Wingerchuk D, Vukusic S, Linbo L, Pittock S, Lucchinetti C, et al. Neuromyelitis optica IgG predicts relapse after longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. Ann Neurol 2006; 59: 566-9.
- Wingerchuk D, Hogancamp W, O'Brien P, Weinshenker B. The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic's syndrome). Neurology 1999; 53: 1107-14.
- Wingerchuk D, Weinshenker B. Neuromyelitis optica. Clinical predictors of a relapsing course and survival. Neurology 2003; 60: 848-53.
- Wingerchuk D, Lennon V, Pittock S, Lucchinetti C, Weinshenker B. Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 2006; 66: 1485-9.
- Wingerchuk D, Lennon V, Lucchinetti C, Pittock S, Weinshenker B. The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 805-15.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges
Brownlee, W. J., Hardy, T. A., Fazekas, F., & Miller, D. H. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30959-x · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Immunology of neuromyelitis optica: a T cell-B cell collaboration
Mitsdoerffer, M., Kuchroo, V., & Korn, T. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12118 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kitley, J., Leite, M. I., Nakashima, I., Waters, P., McNeillis, B., Brown, R., Takai, Y., Takahashi, T., Misu, T., Elsone, L., Woodhall, M., George, J., Boggild, M., Vincent, A., Jacob, A., Fujihara, K., & Palace, J.
- Affiliations
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- Tohoku University (JP)
- Walton Centre (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-05-09
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1834-1849
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2134211282
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 20.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Biogen
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (22229008)
- Teijin Pharma
- Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20390241, 24591247, 22229008, 19209032)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, neuromyelitis optica, aquaporin-4 antibodies, prognostic factors, disability outcome, visual impairment, motor impairment, wheelchair dependence, mortality, age of onset, genetic factors, optic neuritis, relapse rate, immunosuppression, ethnic differences, Afro-Caribbean patients, clinical course
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Blindness, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Disability Evaluation, Ethnicity, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Japan, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Nervous System Diseases, Neuromyelitis Optica, Retrospective Studies, Visual Acuity, Age of Onset, Disease Progression, Statistics, Nonparametric, Aquaporin 4, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review