Cited by 89Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Beyond the face: how context modulates emotion processing in frontotemporal dementia subtypes

Open access
Kumfor, Fiona, Ibañez, Agustin, Hutchings, Rosalind, Hazelton, Jessica L, Hodges, John R, Piguet, Olivier·2018·Brain

Abstract

The importance of assessing social cognition to characterize dementia syndromes is increasingly recognized, with lower social cognition capacity associated with reduced functional independence and greater carer burden. Emotion recognition is impaired in both behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia, yet the social and behavioural changes observed in these syndromes in everyday situations varies. To date, most studies have investigated isolated, context-free stimuli indexing recognition of facial emotions only. Here, we aimed to investigate how contextual information (i.e. emotional body language) influences emotion recognition, within the framework of the Social Context Network Model. Thirty-one patients with frontotemporal dementia (19 behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia; 12 semantic dementia) and 20 healthy age- and education-matched controls were assessed on three tasks which varied contextual cues: (i) face alone; (ii) context alone; and (iii) face embedded in context. Voxel-based morphometry was used to identify neural correlates of task performance. Our results demonstrated that both behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia patients performed worse than controls in recognizing emotions from face alone and context alone. Importantly, performance differed when faces were presented in context. While both behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia patients performed similarly to controls on congruent items (i.e. face emotion and body emotion are the same) (P-values > 0.05), patients with behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia performed worse than both controls (P < 0.001) and patients with semantic dementia (P = 0.044) for incongruent items (i.e. face emotion and body emotion are different). Neuroimaging analyses revealed that abnormal contextual influence was associated with lower integrity of the right parahippocampal gyrus/amygdala and left precentral gyrus. Together, these results indicate that patients with behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia are over-reliant on external contextual information. Conversely, in semantic dementia and controls, contextual influence varies, with the degree of contextual influence appearing to be mediated, at least in part, by the facial expression depicted. The profile in behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia is reminiscent of the 'environmental dependency syndrome' described in frontal lesion patients. It also converges with recent evidence of abnormal face perception in this group. From a theoretical perspective, our findings demonstrate that the capacity to incorporate contextual body language is dependent on the integrity of both contextual association brain regions (i.e. parahippocampal gyrus), as well as regions necessary for processing dynamic body movements. Clinically, these results open new avenues for rehabilitation of social impairments in dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awy002

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Adlam A-L, Patterson K, Rogers T, Nestor P, Salmond C, Acosta- Cabronero Je, et al. Semantic dementia and fluent primary progres- sive aphasia: two sides of the same coin? Brain 2006; 129: 3066-80.
  2. Aminoff EM, Kveraga K, Bar M. The role of the parahippocampal cortex in cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 2013; 17: 379-90.
  3. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry-the methods. Neuroimage 2000; 11: 805-21.
  4. Aviezer H, Bentin S, Hassin RR, Meschino WS, Kennedy J, Grewal S, et al. Not on the face alone: perception of contextualized face ex- pressions in Huntington's disease. Brain 2009; 132: 1633-44.
  5. Aviezer H, Hassin RR, Ryan J, Grady C, Susskind J, Anderson A, et al. Angry, disgusted, or afraid? Studies on the malleability of emotion perception. Psychol Sci 2008; 19: 724-32.
  6. Aviezer H, Trope Y, Todorov A. Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science 2012a; 338: 1225-29.
  7. Aviezer H, Trope Y, Todorov A. Holistic person processing: faces with bodies tell the whole story. J Pers Soc Psychol 2012b; 103: 20.
  8. Bar M, Aminoff E. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 2003; 38: 347-58.
  9. Barrett LF, Mesquita B, Gendron M. Context in emotion perception. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 2011; 20: 286-90.
  10. Bertoux M, Volle E, Funkiewiez A, de Souza LC, Leclercq D, Dubois B. Social Cognition and Emotional Assessment (SEA) is a marker of medial and orbital frontal functions: a voxel-based morphometry study in behavioral variant of frontotemporal degeneration. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2012; 18: 972-85.
  11. Burgess PW, Alderman N, Volle E, Benoit RG, Gilbert SJ. Mesulam's frontal lobe mystery re-examined. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2009; 27: 493-506.
  12. Chan D, Anderson V, Pijenburg Y, Whitwell JL, Barnes J, Scahill R, et al. The clinical profile of right temporal lobe atrophy. Brain 2009; 132: 1287-98.
  13. Davies RR, Hodges JR, Kril JJ, Patterson K, Halliday G, Xuereb JH. The pathological basis of semantic dementia. Brain 2005; 128: 1984-95.
  14. de Gelder B. Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006; 7: 242-9.
  15. De Winter FL, Van den Stock J, de Gelder B, Peeters R, Jastorff J, Sunaert S, et al. Amygdala atrophy affects emotion-related activity in face-responsive regions in frontotemporal degeneration. Cortex 2016; 82: 179-91.
  16. Ekman P. An argument for basic emotions. Cogn Emot 1992; 6: 169- 200.
  17. Ekman P, Friesen WV. Pictures of facial affect. San Francisco, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1976.
  18. Ekman P, Sorenson ER, Friesen WV. Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science 1969; 164: 86-8.
  19. Ghosh A, Dutt A. Utilization behaviour in frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010; 81: 154-6.
  20. Goodkind MS, Sollberger M, Gyurak A, Rosen HJ, Rankin KP, Miller B, et al. Tracking emotional valence: the role of the orbitofrontal cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 2011; 33: 753-62.
  21. Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis A, Weintraub S, Kertesz A, Mendez M, Cappa SF, et al. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 2011; 76: 1006-14.
  22. Hassin RR, Aviezer H, Bentin S. Inherently ambiguous: facial expres- sions of emotions, in context. Emot Rev 2013; 5: 60-5.
  23. Hodges JR, Patterson K, Oxbury S, Funnell E. Semantic dementia: progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy. Brain 1992; 115: 1783-806.
  24. Honan C, McDonald S, Sufani C, Donald H, Kumfor F. The Awareness of Social Inference Test: development of a shortened ver- sion for use in adults with acquired brain injury. Clin Neuropsychol 2016; 30: 243-64.
  25. Hornberger M, Geng J, Hodges JR. Convergent grey and white matter evidence of orbitofrontal cortex changes related to disinhibition in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2011; 134: 2502-12.
  26. Hsieh S, Schubert S, Hoon C, Mioshi E, Hodges JR. Validation of the Addenbrooke's cognitive examination III in frontotemporal demen- tia and Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2013; 36: 242-50.
  27. Hutchings R, Palermo R, Piguet O, Kumfor F. Disrupted face process- ing in frontotemporal dementia: a review of the clinical and neuro- anatomical evidence. Neuropsychol Rev 2017; 27: 18-30.
  28. Iban ˜ez A, Manes F. Contextual social cognition and the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2012; 78: 1354-62.
  29. Irish M, Piguet O, Hodges JR, Hornberger M. Common and unique gray matter correlates of episodic memory dysfunction in frontotem- poral dementia and alzheimer's disease. Hum Brain Mapp 2014; 35: 1422-35.
  30. Kipps CM, Nestor PJ, Acosta-Cabronero J, Arnold R, Hodges JR. Understanding social dysfunction in the behavioural variant of fron- totemporal dementia. The role of emotion and sarcasm processing. Brain 2009; 132: 592-603.
  31. Kolesar TA, Kornelsen J, Smith SD. Separating neural activity asso- ciated with emotion and implied motion: an fMRI Study. Emotion 2017; 17: 131-40.
  32. Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N. Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. J Cogn Neurosci 2000; 12: 48-55.
  33. Kumfor F, Hutchings R, Irish M, Hodges JR, Rhodes G, Palermo R, et al. Do I know you? Examining face and object memory in fron- totemporal dementia. Neuropsychologia 2015; 71: 101-11.
  34. Kumfor F, Irish M, Hodges JR, Piguet O. Discrete neural correlates for the recognition of negative emotions: insights from frontotemporal dementia. PLoS One 2013; 8: e67457.
  35. Kumfor F, Landin-Romero R, Devenney E, Hutchings R, Grasso R, Hodges JR, et al. On the right side? A longitudinal study of left- versus right-lateralized semantic dementia. Brain 2016; 139: 986-98.
  36. Kumfor F, Miller L, Lah S, Hsieh S, Savage S, Hodges JR, et al. Are you really angry? The effect of intensity on emotion recognition in frontotemporal dementia. Soc Neurosci 2011; 6: 502-14.
  37. Kumfor F, Piguet O. Disturbance of emotion processing in frontotem- poral dementia: a synthesis of cognitive and neuroimaging findings. Neuropsychol Rev 2012; 22: 280-97.
  38. Kumfor F, Sapey-Triomphe L-A, Leyton CE, Burrell JR, Hodges JR, Piguet O. Degradation of emotion processing ability in corticobasal syndrome and Alzheimer's disease. Brain 2014; 137: 3061-72.
  39. Lhermitte F. 'Utilization behaviour'and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain 1983; 106: 237-55.
  40. Lhermitte F. Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part II: patient behavior in complex and social situations: the 'environmental de- pendency syndrome'. Ann Neurol 1986; 19: 335-43.
  41. Lhermitte F, Pillon B, Serdaru M. Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part I: imitation and utilization behavior: a neuropsycho- logical study of 75 patients. Ann Neurol 1986; 19: 326-34.
  42. McDonald S, Flanagan S, Rollins J, Kinch J. TASIT: a new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2003; 18: 219.
  43. Mechelli A, Price CJ, Friston KJ, Ashburner J. Voxel-based morphom- etry of the human brain: methods and applications. Curr Med Imaging Rev 2005; 1: 105-13.
  44. Mesulam M. Frontal cortex and behavior. Ann Neurol 1986; 19: 320- 5.
  45. Miller L, Hsieh S, Lah S, Savage S, Hodges JR, Piguet O. One size does not fit all: face emotion processing impairments in semantic dementia, behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease are mediated by distinct cognitive deficits. Behav Neurol 2012; 25: 53-60.
  46. Nichols TE, Holmes AP. Nonparametric permutation tests for func- tional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 15: 1-25.
  47. Oliver LD, Mitchell DG, Dziobek I, MacKinley J, Coleman K, Rankin KP, et al. Parsing cognitive and emotional empathy deficits for nega- tive and positive stimuli in frontotemporal dementia. Neuropsychologia 2015; 67: 14-26.
  48. Rankin KP, Salazar A, Gorno-Tempini ML, Sollberger M, Wilson SM, Pavlic D, et al. Detecting sarcasm from paralinguistic cues: anatomic and cognitive correlates in neurodegenerative disease. Neuroimage 2009; 47: 2005-15.
  49. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman DS, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus JM, et al. Sensitivity of revized diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2011; 134: 2456-77.
  50. Rey A. L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'ence ´phalopathie trau- matique. (Les problems.). [The psychological examination in cases of traumatic encepholopathy. Problems.]. Arch Psychol 1941; 28: 215- 85.
  51. Rosen HJ, Perry RJ, Murphy J, Kramer JH, Mychack P, Schuff N, et al. Emotion comprehension in the temporal variant of frontotem- poral dementia. Brain 2002; 125: 2286-95.
  52. Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DL, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999; 18: 712-21.
  53. Saggar M, Shelly EW, Lepage J-F, Hoeft F, Reiss AL. Revealing the neural networks associated with processing of natural social inter- action and the related effects of actor-orientation and face-visibility. Neuroimage 2014; 84: 648-56.
  54. Savage S, Hsieh S, Leslie F, Foxe D, Piguet O, Hodges JR. Distinguishing subtypes in primary progressive aphasia: application of the Sydney Language Battery. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2013; 35: 208-18.
  55. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004; 23: 208-19.
  56. Sollberger M, Stanley CM, Wilson SM, Gyurak A, Beckman V, Growden ME, et al. Neural basis of interpersonal traits in neurode- generative diseases. Neuropsychologia 2009; 47: 2817-27.
  57. Spreen O, Strauss EA. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms and commentary, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  58. Straube B, Green A, Weis S, Kircher T. A supramodal neural network for speech and gesture semantics: an fMRI Study. PLoS One 2012; 7: e51207.
  59. Tombaugh TN. Trail making test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2004; 19: 203-14.
  60. Van den Stock J, Kumfor F. Behavioural-variant frontotemporal de- mentia: at the interface of interoception, emotion and social cogni- tion? Cortex 2017, in press. pii: S0010-9452(17)30268-X. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.013. · DOI
  61. Van den Stock J, Righart R, de Gelder B. Body expressions influence recognition of emotions in the face and voice. Emotion 2007; 7: 487-94.
  62. Van den Stock J, Vandenbulcke M, Sinke CBA, Goebel R, de Gelder B. How affective information from faces and scenes interacts in the brain. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2014; 9: 1481-8.
  63. Woolrich MW, Jbabdi S, Patenaude B, Chappell M, Makni S, Behren T, et al. Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. Neuroimage 2009; 45: S173-86.
  64. Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S. Segmentation of brain MR images though a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation- maximisation algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20: 45-57.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumfor, F., Ibañez, A., Hutchings, R., Hazelton, J. L., Hodges, J. R., & Piguet, O.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Sydney, Australia
Corresponding author
Kumfor, Fiona
Venue
Brain
Published
2018-01-31
Volume
141
Issue
4
Pages
1172-1185
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2790936874
Cited by
89
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1037746)
  • Australian Research Council (CE11000102)
  • CONICET
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, emotion recognition, social cognition, contextual cues, body language, facial expressions, parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, precentral gyrus, face perception, contextual associations, dementia syndromes, caregiver burden, functional independence, voxel-based morphometry, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Australia, Cognition Disorders, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Regression Analysis, Recognition, Psychology, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review