Cited by 13Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFace Recognition and Perception

Frontotemporal Dementia: A Window to Alexithymia

Open access
Mendez, Mario F.·2021·The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

Alexithymia is pervasive among psychiatric patients, but its neurobiological mechanism is unclear. Patients with alexithymia cannot "read emotions," a process involving interoception, or the perception of the body's internal state, primarily in the insulae. The frontotemporal dementias are also associated with inability to correctly read emotions; hence, these dementias can provide a window into the mechanism of alexithymia. Patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) have a weak emotional signal with impaired emotional recognition, hypoemotionality, and decreased physiological arousal. bvFTD affects the insulae, and the weak emotional signal facilitates impaired interoceptive accuracy, resulting in an overreliance on cognitive appraisal rather than on internal sensations. In contrast, patients with semantic dementia, another frontotemporal dementia syndrome, can have intact interoception, but they have disturbed cognitive appraisal of the meaning of their bodily sensations. This "alexisomia" in semantic dementia can lead to misinterpreted somatic symptoms. Together, the findings in alexithymic patients and frontotemporal dementia syndromes support the model of impaired interoceptive accuracy as the mechanism of alexithymia, possibly from dysfunction in the insulae.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20100252

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mendez, M. F.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Mendez, Mario F.
Venue
The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Published
2021-05
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
157-160
ISSN
  • 0895-0172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7222
OpenAlex
W3127102584
Cited by
13
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG034499, RF1AG050967)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
alexithymia, frontotemporal dementia, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, interoception, insula, emotion recognition, cognitive appraisal, somatic symptoms
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Aged, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Frontotemporal Dementia, Interoception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review