The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comprehensive quantitative analysis of methylated and ethylated DNA using high pressure liquid chromatography
Abstract
Methods were developed for the efficient routine degradation and fractionation of ethylated and methylated DNA. Alkylated DNA was hydrolyzed by a neutral thermal method to yield 3- and 7- alkylpurines and O2-alkylcytosines. The partially apurinic DNA was separated from the bases by precipitation in 0.1 N HCl. Portions of the DNA precipitate were further hydrolyzed either by 0.1 N HCl to yield purine bases, or by enzymes to yield nucleosides and phosphotriesters. The chemical and enzymic digests were fractionated by a combination of high pressure liquid chromatography systems to yield quantitative estimates of the following products from methylated or ethylated DNA: 1-, 3-, and 7-alkyladenines, O2-alkylcytosines, 3-, O6-, and 7- alkylguanines and O2-, 3-, and O4-alkylthymines. N6-Alkyladenines, 1-alkylguanines and N2-alkylguanines were not detected and the 3- alkylcytosines were detected but not quantified. Phosphotriesters were estimated from the amounts of recovered alkyl phosphotriesters of thymidylyl (3'-5') thymidine. Using these methods, it was possible to account for 98, 81, 98, and 92% of the DNA bound alkyl groups obtained from DNA reacted with [14C]methyl methanesulfonate, [3H]ethyl methanesulfonate, N-[3H]-methyl-N-nitrosourea, and N-[14C]ethyl-N-nitrosourea, respectively. The methods described provide reproducible and quantitative methods of analysis for all the known methylated or ethylated products in a single DNA sample.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mutagenesis and inducible responses to deoxyribonucleic acid damage in Escherichia coli
Walker, G. C. (1984) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.48.1.60-93.1984 · Cited by 1,770
MUTAGENESIS BY APURINIC/APYRIMIDINIC SITES
Loeb, L. A., & Preston, B. D. (1986) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.20.120186.001221 · Cited by 901
DNA damage-induced cell death: From specific DNA lesions to the DNA damage response and apoptosis
Roos, W. P., & Kaina, B. (2013) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2012.01.007 · Cited by 879
Gates, K. S. (2009) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx900242k · Cited by 484
Non-bulky Lesions in Human DNA: The Ways of Formation, Repair, and Replication
Ignatov, А. V., Bondarenko, K. A., & Makarova, A. V. (2017) · Acta Naturae · doi:10.32607/20758251-2017-9-3-12-26 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Beranek, D. T., Weis, C. C., & Swenson, D. H.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1980
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 595-606
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W2072083287
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comprehensive quantitative analysis of methylated and ethylated DNA using high pressure liquid chromatography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/1.7.595
- The paper
- Beranek, D. T., Weis, C. C., & Swenson, D. H. (1980). A comprehensive quantitative analysis of methylated and ethylated DNA using high pressure liquid chromatography. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/1.7.595
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.