Cited by 30Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentLiver physiology and pathologyHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis

Enhanced preneoplastic liver lesion development under ‘selection pressure’ conditions after administration of deoxycholic or lithocholic acid in the initiation phase in rats

Kitazawa, Shunji, Denda, Ayumi, Tsutsumi, Masahiro, Tsujiuchi, Toshifumi, Hasegawa, Kiyohiko, Tamura, Kazutoshi, Maruyama, Hiroshi, Konishi, Yoichi·1990·Carcinogenesis

Abstract

The initiating potential of the secondary bile acids, deoxycholic acid (DCA) and lithocholic acid (LCA), for rat hepatocarcinogenesis was investigated using the development of hyperplastic nodules and/or glutathione S-transferase placental form (GST-P)-positive liver foci as the end point. Five week old male F344 rats were given either basal diet, or diets containing 0.5% DCA or 0.5% LCA for 3 weeks in conjunction with partial hepatectomy performed midway, followed by a selection regimen consisting of 2 weeks feeding of 0.02% 2-acetylaminofluorene diet and a single gastric intubation of carbon tetrachloride. The animals were then placed on either basal diet or a diet containing 0.05% phenobarbital (PB) for 52 weeks. Significantly higher numbers of hyperplastic liver nodules developed in the DCA-treated rats irrespective of PB promotion as compared with the respective control groups. No such increase was evident in the LCA-treated rats. In contrast, both DCA and LCA treatments enhanced the development of GST-P-positive liver foci with or without subsequent PB promotion. Only one hepatocellular carcinoma was diagnosed in a control group animal. The present data indicate that a short period of feeding of DCA and LCA in the initiation stage in conjunction with partial hepatectomy results in enhanced development of preneoplastic liver lesions under selection pressure conditions with or without subsequent PB promotion. They thus confirm and extend our previous finding of enhanced gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-positive liver foci development in a short-term assay of DCA and LCA, and suggest that these secondary bile acids either possess possible initiating activity or some other priming effect for rat hepatocarcinogenesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/carcin/11.8.1323

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitazawa, S., Denda, A., Tsutsumi, M., Tsujiuchi, T., Hasegawa, K., Tamura, K., Maruyama, H., & Konishi, Y.
Affiliations
Nara Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Konishi, Yoichi
Venue
Carcinogenesis
Published
1990
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
1323-1328
ISSN
  • 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2180
OpenAlex
W2098844173
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Carcinogenesis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Keywords
deoxycholic acid, lithocholic acid, secondary bile acids, hepatocarcinogenesis, preneoplastic liver lesions, glutathione S-transferase placental form, 2-acetylaminofluorene, carbon tetrachloride, phenobarbital, partial hepatectomy, selection pressure, liver foci, F344 rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Deoxycholic Acid, gamma-Glutamyltransferase, Glutathione Transferase, Lithocholic Acid, Liver Neoplasms, Experimental, Male, Phenobarbital, Precancerous Conditions, Rats, Inbred F344, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review