The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quercetin and rutin as inhibitors of azoxymethanol-induced colonic neoplasia
Abstract
Dietary quercetin (QU) and rutin (RU), phenolic flavonoids commonly found in many fruits and vegetables, were provided to CF1 female mice for 50 weeks to assess the ability of these compounds to inhibit azoxymethanol (AOM)-induced colonic neoplasia. In addition to a control group fed an AIN 76A diet, five other groups received that diet to which was added either 0.1, 0.5 or 2.0% QU and 1.0 or 4.0% RU. Acute studies revealed that, among saline controls, no alteration of any proliferative parameters of colonic epithelial cells was observed among those groups receiving any dose of QU or RU. However, among the AOM-treated mice, both 2% QU and 4% RU significantly reduced hyperproliferation and inhibited the shift of S-phase cells to the middle and upper portion of crypts. Moreover, mice fed these concentrations of QU and RU had significantly fewer AOM-induced focal areas of dysplasia (FADs) than those fed the control diet (0.2 +/- 0.4 and 0.4 +/- 0.5 versus 3.6 +/- 2.3 respectively). Tumors occurred more frequently in the distal half of the colon, regardless of treatment. Compared with controls, mice fed 2% QU had a significantly reduced tumor incidence (25.0% versus 5.9%, P = 0.03). Those fed 4% RU showed only a trend toward inhibition (25% versus 9.7%, P = 0.11). Nevertheless, both 2% QU and 4% RU suppressed tumor multiplicity, i.e. fewer tumors/animal arose in these groups than in the AOM-treated control mice (1.2 versus 2.3, P = 0.005; 1.1 versus 2.3, P = 0.003 respectively). Clearly, QU and RU exhibit significant activity in reducing AOM-induced hyperproliferation of colonic epithelial cells and FAD incidence. This behavior successfully forecast the ability of both flavonoids to suppress tumor multiplicity and ultimately tumor development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Middleton, E., Kandaswami, C., & Theoharides, T. C. (2000) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01472-8 · Cited by 4,882
Shahidi, F., & Ambigaipalan, P. (2015) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018 · Cited by 3,081
Vegetables, Fruit, and Cancer Prevention
STEINMETZ, K. A., & POTTER, J. D. (1996) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(96)00273-8 · Cited by 2,118
Hertog, M. G. L. (1995) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1995.00430040053006 · Cited by 1,853
Hertog, M. G. L., Hollman, P. C. H., & Katan, M. B. (1992) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf00024a011 · Cited by 1,378
Metadata
- Authors
- Deschner, E. E., Ruperto, J., Wong, G., & Newmark, H. L.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1193-1196
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W2029416355
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quercetin and rutin as inhibitors of azoxymethanol-induced colonic neoplasia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/12.7.1193
- The paper
- Deschner, E. E., Ruperto, J., Wong, G., & Newmark, H. L. (1991). Quercetin and rutin as inhibitors of azoxymethanol-induced colonic neoplasia. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/12.7.1193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.