The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cancer risk of heterocyclic amines in cooked foods: an analysis and implications for research
Abstract
Heterocyclic amines (HAs) are formed as pyrolysis products during the cooking of meats/fish. These substances are potent mutagens in the Ames/Salmonella assay and are also carcinogens in laboratory animals. In order to assess the magnitude of the cancer risk posed by their presence in the US diet, we estimated the average intakes of HAs, based on analyses of the concentrations of HAs in cooked foods and data from a dietary survey of the US population and quantified the cancer potencies of the individual compounds using dose-response data from animal bioassays. Measured concentrations of HAs in cooked foods were taken from a major review of the open literature. Only those concentrations that were associated with normal cooking conditions were chosen for use in estimating dietary intakes. The average consumption of HA-bearing foods was determined by analyzing statistically the intakes of 3563 individuals who provided 3 day dietary records in a USDA sponsored random survey of the US population during 1989. Dietary intakes of the five principal HAs in descending order were 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) > 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (A alpha C) > 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeIQx) > 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (DiMeIQx) > 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ). The carcinogenic potencies, in contrast, were almost the reverse order: IQ > DiMeIQx > MeIQx > PhIP > A alpha C. An upper-bound estimate of the incremental cancer risk is 1.1 x 10(-4), using cancer potencies based on a body surface area basis. Nearly half (46%) of the incremental risk was due to ingestion of PhIP. Consumption of meat and fish products contributed the most (approximately 80%) to total risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Creatine and Creatinine Metabolism
Wyss, M., & Kaddurah-Daouk, R. (2000) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2000.80.3.1107 · Cited by 2,950
(2000) · PubMed · Cited by 684
Meat Consumption and Risk of Colorectal Cancer
Chao, A. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.2.172 · Cited by 587
Skog, K. I., Johansson, M. A. E., & Jägerstad, M. I. (1998) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0278-6915(98)00061-1 · Cited by 503
Zelber-Sagi, S., Ivancovsky-Wajcman, D., Fliss Isakov, N., Webb, M., Orenstein, D., Shibolet, O., & Kariv, R. (2018) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.01.015 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Layton, D. W., Bogen, K. T., Knize, M. G., Hatch, F. T., Johnson, V. M., & Felton, J. S.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-52
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W2127321206
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer risk of heterocyclic amines in cooked foods: an analysis and implications for research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/16.1.39
- The paper
- Layton, D. W., Bogen, K. T., Knize, M. G., Hatch, F. T., Johnson, V. M., & Felton, J. S. (1995). Cancer risk of heterocyclic amines in cooked foods: an analysis and implications for research. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/16.1.39
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.