The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meat Consumption and Risk of Colorectal Cancer
Abstract
CONTEXT: Consumption of red and processed meat has been associated with colorectal cancer in many but not all epidemiological studies; few studies have examined risk in relation to long-term meat intake or the association of meat with rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between recent and long-term meat consumption and the risk of incident colon and rectal cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 148 610 adults aged 50 to 74 years (median, 63 years), residing in 21 states with population-based cancer registries, who provided information on meat consumption in 1982 and again in 1992/1993 when enrolled in the Cancer Prevention Study II (CPS II) Nutrition Cohort. Follow-up from time of enrollment in 1992/1993 through August 31, 2001, identified 1667 incident colorectal cancers. Participants contributed person-years at risk until death or a diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence rate ratio (RR) of colon and rectal cancer. RESULTS: High intake of red and processed meat reported in 1992/1993 was associated with higher risk of colon cancer after adjusting for age and energy intake but not after further adjustment for body mass index, cigarette smoking, and other covariates. When long-term consumption was considered, persons in the highest tertile of consumption in both 1982 and 1992/1993 had higher risk of distal colon cancer associated with processed meat (RR, 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.17), and ratio of red meat to poultry and fish (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.08-2.18) relative to those persons in the lowest tertile at both time points. Long-term consumption of poultry and fish was inversely associated with risk of both proximal and distal colon cancer. High consumption of red meat reported in 1992/1993 was associated with higher risk of rectal cancer (RR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.15-2.52; P = .007 for trend), as was high consumption reported in both 1982 and 1992/1993 (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.00-2.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the potential value of examining long-term meat consumption in assessing cancer risk and strengthen the evidence that prolonged high consumption of red and processed meat may increase the risk of cancer in the distal portion of the large intestine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistics and Causal Inference
Holland, P. W. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354 · Cited by 5,293
RE: “TOTAL ENERGY INTAKE: IMPLICATIONS FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC ANALYSES”
Palmgren, J., & Kushi, L. H. (1991) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115841 · Cited by 2,711
Willett, W. C., Stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G. A., Rosner, B. A., & Speizer, F. E. (1990) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199012133232404 · Cited by 1,248
International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision
National Cancer Institute (2020) · Definitions · doi:10.32388/bd1nux · Cited by 888
Structure of Dietary Measurement Error: Results of the OPEN Biomarker Study
Kipnis, V. (2003) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwg091 · Cited by 862
A reduced dietary questionnaire: development and validation
Block, G., Hartman, A. M., & Naughton, D. (1990) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199001000-00013 · Cited by 711
Intake of fat, meat, and fiber in relation to risk of colon cancer in men.
Giovannucci, E. L., Rimm, E. B., Stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G. A., Ascherio, A., & Willett, W. C. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 696
Cancer risk of heterocyclic amines in cooked foods: an analysis and implications for research
Layton, D. W., Bogen, K. T., Knize, M. G., Hatch, F. T., Johnson, V. M., & Felton, J. S. (1995) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/16.1.39 · Cited by 553
Meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: Dose‐response meta‐analysis of epidemiological studies
Norat, T., Lukanova, A., Ferrari, P., & Riboli, E. (2002) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.10126 · Cited by 501
Bostick, R. M., Potter, J. D., Kushi, L. H., Sellers, T. A., Steinmetz, K. A., McKenzie, D. R., Gapstur, S. M., & Folsom, A. R. (1994) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1007/bf01830725 · Cited by 494
Cited by
Kamangar, F., Dores, G. M., & Anderson, W. F. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.2308 · Cited by 3,434
Cancer is a preventable disease that requires major lifestyle changes
Anand, P., Kunnumakara, A. B., Sundaram, C., Harikumar, K. B., Tharakan, S. T., Lai, O. S., Sung, B., & Aggarwal, B. B. (2008) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-008-9661-9 · Cited by 2,632
Edwards, B. K., Ward, E., Kohler, B. A., Eheman, C., Zauber, A. G., Anderson, R. N., Jemal, A., Schymura, M. J., Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, I., Seeff, L. C., et al. (2010) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24760 · Cited by 2,002
Kushi, L. H., Byers, T., Doyle, C., Bandera, E. V., McCullough, M., Gansler, T., Andrews, K. S., Thun, M. J., & The American Cancer Society 2006 Nutrition and Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (2006) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.56.5.254 · Cited by 1,901
Self-citationThe impact of diet and lifestyle on gut microbiota and human health
Conlon, M., & Bird, A. (2014) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu7010017 · Cited by 1,567
Metadata
- Authors
- Chao, A.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2005-01-12
- Volume
- 293
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 172
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2123937146
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 45.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meat Consumption and Risk of Colorectal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.293.2.172
- The paper
- Chao, A. (2005). Meat Consumption and Risk of Colorectal Cancer. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.2.172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.