The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumption of vegetables reduces genetic damage in humans: first results of a human intervention trial with carotenoid-rich foods
Abstract
A human intervention study with vegetable products has been performed in twenty three healthy, non smoking males aged 27-40. It was the aim of the study to assess whether consumption of vegetables containing different carotenoids could protect against DNA damage and oxidative DNA damage. The subjects consumed their normal diets, but abstained from vegetables high in carotenoids throughout the study period. After a 2 week depletion period, they received daily 330 ml tomato juice with 40 mg lycopene (weeks 3 and 4), 330 ml carrot juice with 22.3 mg beta-carotene and 15.7 mg alpha-carotene (weeks 5 and 6), and 10 g dried spinach powder (in water or milk) with 11.3 mg lutein (weeks 7 and 8). Blood was collected weekly and DNA damage was detected in peripheral blood lymphocytes with the 'COMET' assay. Oxidised DNA bases were detected by including an incubation step with endonuclease III. The supplementation of the diet with tomato, carrot or spinach products resulted in a significant decrease in endogenous levels of strand breaks in lymphocyte DNA. Oxidative base damage was significantly reduced during the carrot juice intervention. These findings support the hypothesis that carotenoid containing plant products exert a cancer-protective effect via a decrease in oxidative and other damage to DNA in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diet and Health: What Should We Eat?
Willett, W. C. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8160011 · Cited by 1,008
Cited by
The Comet Assay for DNA Damage and Repair: Principles, Applications, and Limitations
Collins, A. R. (2004) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/mb:26:3:249 · Cited by 2,892
Reactive oxygen species, aging and antioxidative nutraceuticals
Lee, J., Koo, N., & Min, D. B. (2004) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2004.tb00058.x · Cited by 864
Health effects of vegetables and fruit: assessing mechanisms of action in human experimental studies
Lampe, J. W. (1999) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/70.3.475s · Cited by 786
Role of Antioxidant Lycopene in Cancer and Heart Disease
Rao, A. V., & Agarwal, S. (2000) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.2000.10718953 · Cited by 667
Methods of in vitro toxicology
Eisenbrand, G., Pool-Zobel, B., Baker, V, Balls, M., Blaauboer, B. J., Boobis, A., Carere, A., Kevekordes, S., Lhuguenot, J.-C., Pieters, R., et al. (2002) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0278-6915(01)00118-1 · Cited by 462
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pool-Zobel, B.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-09-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1847-1850
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W2100906922
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumption of vegetables reduces genetic damage in humans: first results of a human intervention trial with carotenoid-rich foods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/18.9.1847
- The paper
- Pool-Zobel, B. (1997). Consumption of vegetables reduces genetic damage in humans: first results of a human intervention trial with carotenoid-rich foods. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/18.9.1847
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.