Cited by 193Skin Protection and AgingTea Polyphenols and Effectsmelanin and skin pigmentation

Prevention of UVB-induced immunosuppression in mice by the green tea polyphenol (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate may be associated with alterations in IL-10 and IL-12 production

Katiyar, Santosh K., Challa, Anjana, McCormick, Thomas S., Cooper, Kevin D., Mukhtar, Hasan·1999·Carcinogenesis

Abstract

UV exposure of the skin, particularly UVB (290-320 nm), causes adverse biological effects, including alterations in cutaneous immune cells, photoaging and photocarcinogenesis. Several studies have shown that polyphenolic compounds isolated from green tea afford protection against UVB-induced inflammatory responses and photocarcinogenesis in murine models. In this study we show that topical application of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) (3 mg/mouse), a major polyphenolic component of green tea, before a single low dose UVB exposure (72 mJ/cm(2)) to C3H/HeN mice prevented UVB-induced inhibition of the contact hypersensitivity response and tolerance induction to the contact sensitizer 2, 4-dinitrofluorobenzene. Topical application of EGCG before UVB exposure reduced the number of CD11b+ monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils infiltrating into skin inflammatory lesions, which are considered to be responsible for creating the UV-induced immunosuppressive state. In addition, application of EGCG before UVB exposure decreased UVB-induced production of the immunomodulatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-10 in skin as well as in draining lymph nodes (DLN), whereas production of IL-12, which is considered to be a mediator and adjuvant for induction of contact sensitivity, was found to be markedly increased in DLN when compared with UVB alone-exposed mice. Taken together, our data demonstrate that EGCG protects against UVB-induced immunosuppression and tolerance induction by: (i) blockin…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/carcin/20.11.2117

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 193

Authors
Katiyar, S. K., Challa, A., McCormick, T. S., Cooper, K. D., & Mukhtar, H.
Affiliations
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
Carcinogenesis
Published
1999-11
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
2117-2124
ISSN
  • 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2180
OpenAlex
W2136973671
Cited by
193
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Carcinogenesis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Cancer Society
  • American Institute for Cancer Research
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ar041707-07, 5r01ca051802-09)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA 78809, R01CA078809, CA51802)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (5RO1 AR41707)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Tea Polyphenols and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
UVB-induced immunosuppression, epigallocatechin gallate, green tea polyphenols, IL-10, IL-12, contact hypersensitivity, 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene, neutrophil infiltration, draining lymph nodes, photocarcinogenesis, topical application, skin inflammation
MeSH terms
Administration, Topical, Animals, Catechin, Female, Immune System, Mice, Inbred C3H, Tea, Ultraviolet Rays, Anticarcinogenic Agents, Interleukin-10, Interleukin-12, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review