Prevention of UVB-induced immunosuppression in mice by the green tea polyphenol (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate may be associated with alterations in IL-10 and IL-12 production
Abstract
UV exposure of the skin, particularly UVB (290-320 nm), causes adverse biological effects, including alterations in cutaneous immune cells, photoaging and photocarcinogenesis. Several studies have shown that polyphenolic compounds isolated from green tea afford protection against UVB-induced inflammatory responses and photocarcinogenesis in murine models. In this study we show that topical application of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) (3 mg/mouse), a major polyphenolic component of green tea, before a single low dose UVB exposure (72 mJ/cm(2)) to C3H/HeN mice prevented UVB-induced inhibition of the contact hypersensitivity response and tolerance induction to the contact sensitizer 2, 4-dinitrofluorobenzene. Topical application of EGCG before UVB exposure reduced the number of CD11b+ monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils infiltrating into skin inflammatory lesions, which are considered to be responsible for creating the UV-induced immunosuppressive state. In addition, application of EGCG before UVB exposure decreased UVB-induced production of the immunomodulatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-10 in skin as well as in draining lymph nodes (DLN), whereas production of IL-12, which is considered to be a mediator and adjuvant for induction of contact sensitivity, was found to be markedly increased in DLN when compared with UVB alone-exposed mice. Taken together, our data demonstrate that EGCG protects against UVB-induced immunosuppression and tolerance induction by: (i) blockin…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Green tea polyphenols protect against immunosuppression.
“| (epigallocatechin-3-gallate), | fractions isolated | Immunosuppression | | + | (115,116) |”
From Photoprotection: a Review of the Current and Future Technologies (2010) · cites this paper as [116]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 193
- Authors
- Katiyar, S. K., Challa, A., McCormick, T. S., Cooper, K. D., & Mukhtar, H.
- Affiliations
- University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2117-2124
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W2136973671
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 11.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Carcinogenesis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Cancer Society
- American Institute for Cancer Research
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ar041707-07, 5r01ca051802-09)
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA 78809, R01CA078809, CA51802)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (5RO1 AR41707)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Tea Polyphenols and Effects
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Keywords
- UVB-induced immunosuppression, epigallocatechin gallate, green tea polyphenols, IL-10, IL-12, contact hypersensitivity, 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene, neutrophil infiltration, draining lymph nodes, photocarcinogenesis, topical application, skin inflammation
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Topical, Animals, Catechin, Female, Immune System, Mice, Inbred C3H, Tea, Ultraviolet Rays, Anticarcinogenic Agents, Interleukin-10, Interleukin-12, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review