The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dose-dependent effect of dietary meat on endogenous colonic N-nitrosation
Abstract
Human male volunteers were studied in a metabolic facility whilst they were fed randomized controlled diets. In eight volunteers there was a significant increase in faecal apparent total N:-nitroso compounds (ATNC) and nitrite excretion (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.046, respectively) when randomized doses of meat were increased from 0 to 60, 240 and 420 g/day over 10 day periods. Mean (+/- SE) faecal ATNC levels were 54 +/- 7 microg/day when the diets contained no meat, 52 +/- 11 microg/day when the diets contained 60 g meat/day, 159 +/- 33 microg/day with 240 g meat and 199 +/- 36 microg/day with 420 g meat. Higher concentrations of NOC were associated with longer times of transit in the gut (r = 0.55, P = 0.001) and low faecal weight (r = -0.51, P = 0.004). There was no significant decline in levels in individuals fed 420 g meat for 40 days. The exposures found on the higher meat diets were comparable with other sources of N:-nitroso compounds (NOC), such as tobacco smoke. Many NOC are known large bowel initiators and promotors in colon cancer, inducing G-->A transitions in codons 12 and 13 of K-ras. Endogenous NOC formation, combined with prolonged transit times in the gut, may explain the epidemiological associations between high meat/low fibre diets and colorectal cancer risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gut flora in health and disease
Guarner, F., & Malagelada, J.-R. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12489-0 · Cited by 3,365
Russell, W. R., Gratz, S. W., Duncan, S. H., Holtrop, G., Ince, J., Scobbie, L., Duncan, G., Johnstone, A. M., Lobley, G. E., Wallace, R. J., et al. (2011) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.110.002188 · Cited by 775
Red Meat Consumption and Mortality: Results From 2 Prospective Cohort Studies
Sun, Q. (2012) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.2287 · Cited by 763
Meat Consumption and Risk of Colorectal Cancer
Chao, A. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.2.172 · Cited by 587
Meat Intake and Mortality: A Prospective Study of Over Half a Million People
Sinha, R., Cross, A. J., Graubard, B. I., Leitzmann, M. F., & Schatzkin, A. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.6 · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Authors
- Hughes, R.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 199-202
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W2124318306
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dose-dependent effect of dietary meat on endogenous colonic N-nitrosation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/22.1.199
- The paper
- Hughes, R. (2001). Dose-dependent effect of dietary meat on endogenous colonic N-nitrosation. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/22.1.199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.