The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and risk of lung cancer
Abstract
Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes may be associated with differences in the repair efficiency of DNA damage and may influence an individual's risk of lung cancer. The frequencies of several amino acid substitutions in XRCC1 (Arg194Trp, Arg280His and Arg399Gln), XRCC3 (Thr241Met), XPD (Ile199Met, His201Tyr, Asp312Asn and Lys751Gln) and XPF (Pro379Ser) genes were studied in 96 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases and in 96 healthy controls matched for age, gender and cigarette smoking. The XPD codon 312 Asp/Asp genotype was found to have almost twice the risk of lung cancer when the Asp/Asn + Asn/Asn combined genotype served as reference [odds ratio (OR) 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-3.40]. In light cigarette smokers (less than the median of 34.5 pack-years), the XPD codon 312 Asp/Asp genotype was more frequent among cases than in controls and was associated with an increased risk of NSCLC. Compared with the Asn/Asn carriers, the OR in light smokers with the Asp/Asn genotype was 1.70 (CI0.35 0.43-6.74) and the OR in those with the Asp/Asp genotype was 5.32 (CI0.35-21.02) (P trend = 0.01). The 312 Asp/Asp genotype was not associated with lung cancer risk in never-smokers or heavy smokers (>34.5 pack-years). The XPD-312Asp and -751Lys polymorphisms were in linkage disequilibrium in the group studied; this finding was further supported by pedigree analysis of four families from Utah. The XPD 312Asp amino acid is evolutionarily conserved and is located in the seven-motif helicase domain of the RecQ family of DNA helicases. Our results indicate that these polymorphisms in the XPD gene should be investigated further for the possible attenuation of DNA repair and apoptotic functions and that additional molecular epidemiological studies are warranted to extend these findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sancar, A. (1996) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.000355 · Cited by 1,131
Cited by
Bernstein, C. (2002) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/s1383-5742(02)00009-1 · Cited by 527
Recombinational DNA repair and human disease
Thompson, L. H., & Schild, D. (2002) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00224-5 · Cited by 417
Qiao, Y., Spitz, M. R., Shen, H., Guo, Z., Shete, S., Hedayati, M., Grossman, L., Mohrenweiser, H., & Wei, Q. (2002) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/23.2.295 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Butkiewicz, D., Rusin, M., Enewold, L., Shields, P. G., Chorazy, M., & Harris, C. C.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 593-597
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W2155980739
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and risk of lung cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/22.4.593
- The paper
- Butkiewicz, D., Rusin, M., Enewold, L., Shields, P. G., Chorazy, M., & Harris, C. C. (2001). Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and risk of lung cancer. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/22.4.593
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.