The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genotypes affect benzo[a]pyrene DNA adducts in smokers' lung: comparison with aromatic/hydrophobic adduct formation
Abstract
Benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE)-DNA adducts are involved in the induction of p53 mutations and probably in the causation of human lung cancer associated with cigarette smoking. The ratio between CYP1A1 and GST enzyme activities is a critical determinant of the target dose of carcinogenic BPDE and other DNA-reactive PAH metabolites. In this review, we summarize the published data on modulation of (+)-anti-BPDE-DNA adduct levels in smokers' lungs by CYP1A1*2 genotypes alone or in combination with GSTM1 polymorphism and compare these results with those reported for aromatic/hydrophobic (bulky) DNA adducts. The data published so far show only a trend for a non-significant increase in bulky DNA adduct levels in subjects with GSTM1*0 or the CYP1A1*2-GSTM1*0 genotype combination. In contrast, a clear dependence of (+)-anti-BPDE-DNA adduct levels was found as a function of the CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genotypes: In lung parenchyma, this adduct was more pronounced in persons with the GSTM1*0 genotype, and CYP1A1*2-GSTM1*0 carriers had higher (+)-anti-BPDE-DNA adduct levels than those with CYP1A1*1/*1-GSTM1*0. The homozygous CYP1A1*2/*2 carriers in the GSTM1*0 group had the highest (+)-anti-BPDE-DNA adduct levels. Our analysis leads to the conclusion that the risk-modifying effects of metabolic genotypes and of gene interactions might be more easily identifiable if specific markers of structurally defined adducts were used, such as the (+)-anti-BPDE-DNA adduct. These results are also consistent with the hypothesis that BP (PAH) induce G:C to T:A transversion mutations in the hotspot codons of the p53 tumor suppressor gene and are thus involved in malignant transformation of the lung tissue of smokers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
p53 Mutations in Human Cancers
Hollstein, M., Sidransky, D., Vogelstein, B., & Harris, C. C. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1905840 · Cited by 8,018
Preferential Formation of Benzo[ a ]pyrene Adducts at Lung Cancer Mutational Hotspots in P53
Denissenko, M. F., Pao, A., Tang, M.-S., & Pfeifer, G. P. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5286.430 · Cited by 1,650
Cited by
Environmental pollutants and breast cancer: Epidemiologic studies
Brody, J. G., Moysich, K. B., Humblet, O., Attfield, K. R., Beehler, G. P., & Rudel, R. A. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22655 · Cited by 375
Contributions of Human Enzymes in Carcinogen Metabolism
Rendic, S., & Guengerich, F. P. (2012) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx300132k · Cited by 279
Glutathione S transferase deficiency and passive smoking increase childhood asthma
Kabesch, M. (2004) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.2003.016667 · Cited by 209
In utero tobacco exposure epigenetically modifies placental CYP1A1 expression
Suter, M., Abramovici, A., Showalter, L., Hu, M., Shope, C. D., Varner, M., & Aagaard-Tillery, K. (2010) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2010.01.013 · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Alexandrov, K.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1969-1977
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W2103950007
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genotypes affect benzo[a]pyrene DNA adducts in smokers' lung: comparison with aromatic/hydrophobic adduct formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/23.12.1969
- The paper
- Alexandrov, K. (2002). CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genotypes affect benzo[a]pyrene DNA adducts in smokers' lung: comparison with aromatic/hydrophobic adduct formation. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/23.12.1969
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.