The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nutritional modulation of DNA repair in a human intervention study
Abstract
DNA oxidation is a potential cause of cancer in humans. It is well-known that fruits and vegetables protect against cancer, and this may be in part because they contain antioxidants, which decrease the level of oxidation of DNA. However, there are other possible mechanisms, such as an enhancement of cellular repair of this damage. A randomized cross-over study was carried out on healthy human subjects, who were given kiwifruit as a supplement to their normal diet, for 3-week periods at different 'doses', with 2-week washout periods between doses. Endogenous oxidation of bases in lymphocyte DNA, and the resistance of the DNA to oxidation ex vivo, were assessed using single cell gel electrophoresis (the 'comet assay'). The capacity to repair DNA base oxidation was measured with an in vitro test, and levels of expression of repair-related genes OGG1 and APE1 were assessed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Concentrations of dietary antioxidants were measured in plasma. The antioxidant status of plasma and of lymphocytes was increased by consumption of kiwifruit. Levels of endogenous oxidation of pyrimidines and purines in DNA were markedly decreased, and DNA repair measured on a substrate containing 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine was substantially increased (without change in levels of OGG1 or APE1 mRNA). The magnitude of these effects was generally not related to the number of kiwifruits consumed per day. Kiwifruit provides a dual protection against oxidative DNA damage, enhancing antioxidant levels and stimulating DNA repair. It is probable that together these effects would decrease the risk of mutagenic changes leading to cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199404143301501 · Cited by 4,737
Effects of a combination of beta carotene and vitamin A on lung cancer and cardiovascular disease
Omenn, G. S., Goodman, G. E., Thornquist, M. D., Balmes, J., Cullen, M. R., Glass, A., Keogh, J. P., Meyskens, F. L., Valanis, B., Williams, J. H., et al. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199605023341802 · Cited by 3,638
Cited by
The Comet Assay for DNA Damage and Repair: Principles, Applications, and Limitations
Collins, A. R. (2004) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/mb:26:3:249 · Cited by 2,892
Self-citationThe comet assay: topical issues
Collins, A. R., Oscoz, A. A., Brunborg, G., Gaivao, I., Giovannelli, L., Kruszewski, M., Smith, C. C., & Stetina, R. (2008) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gem051 · Cited by 991
Self-citationHalliwell, B., Rafter, J., & Jenner, A. (2005) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/81.1.268s · Cited by 711
Micronutritional approaches to periodontal therapy
Van der Velden, U., Kuzmanova, D., & Chapple, I. L. C. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01663.x · Cited by 199
Measurement of oxidatively generated base damage to nucleic acids in cells: facts and artifacts
Cadet, J., Douki, T., Ravanat, J.-L., & Wagner, J. R. (2012) · Bioanalytical Reviews · doi:10.1007/s12566-012-0029-6 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Collins, A. R.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-03-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 511-515
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W2116129262
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutritional modulation of DNA repair in a human intervention study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/24.3.511
- The paper
- Collins, A. R. (2003). Nutritional modulation of DNA repair in a human intervention study. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/24.3.511
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.