The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of epigenetic effectors in maintenance of the long-term persistent bystander effect in spleen in vivo
Open accessAbstract
Radiation therapy is a primary treatment modality for brain tumors, yet it has been linked to the increased incidence of secondary, post-radiation therapy cancers. These cancers are thought to be linked to indirect radiation-induced bystander effect. Bystander effect occurs when irradiated cells communicate damage to nearby, non-irradiated 'bystander' cells, ultimately contributing to genome destabilization in the non-exposed cells. Recent evidence suggests that bystander effect may be epigenetic in nature; however, characterization of epigenetic mechanisms involved in bystander effect generation and its long-term persistence has yet to be defined. To investigate the possibility that localized X-ray irradiation induces persistent bystander effects in distant tissue, we monitored the induction of epigenetic changes (i.e. alterations in DNA methylation, histone methylation and microRNA (miRNA) expression) in the rat spleen tissue 24 h and 7 months after localized cranial exposure to 20 Gy of X-rays. We found that localized cranial radiation exposure led to the induction of bystander effect in lead-shielded, distant spleen tissue. Specifically, this exposure caused the profound epigenetic dysregulation in the bystander spleen tissue that manifested as a significant loss of global DNA methylation, alterations in methylation of long interspersed nucleotide element-1 (LINE-1) retrotransposable elements and down-regulation of DNA methyltransferases and methyl-binding protein methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2). Further, irradiation significantly altered expression of miR-194, a miRNA putatively targeting both DNA methyltransferase-3a and MeCP2. This study is the first to report conclusive evidence of the long-term persistence of bystander effects in radiation carcinogenesis target organ (spleen) upon localized distant exposure using the doses comparable with those used for clinical brain tumor treatments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jaenisch, R., & Bird, A. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1089 · Cited by 6,325
Cited by
MicroRNAs: Predictors and modifiers of chemo- and radiotherapy in different tumour types
Hummel, R., Hussey, D. J., & Haier, J. (2010) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2009.10.027 · Cited by 344
The role of miRNA in the direct and indirect effects of ionizing radiation
Dickey, J. S., Zemp, F. J., Martin, O. A., & Kovalchuk, O. (2011) · Radiation and Environmental Biophysics · doi:10.1007/s00411-011-0386-5 · Cited by 88
Self-citationInheritance of paternal DNA damage by histone-mediated repair restriction
Wang, S., Meyer, D. H., & Schumacher, B. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05544-w · Cited by 68
Kovalchuk, A., & Kolb, B. (2017) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.1080/15384101.2017.1320003 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Koturbash, I., Boyko, A., Rodriguez-Juarez, R., McDonald, R. J., Tryndyak, V. P., Kovalchuk, I., Pogribny, I. P., & Kovalchuk, O.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-07
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1831-1838
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W2078969217
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of epigenetic effectors in maintenance of the long-term persistent bystander effect in spleen in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/bgm053
- The paper
- Koturbash, I., Boyko, A., Rodriguez-Juarez, R., McDonald, R. J., Tryndyak, V. P., Kovalchuk, I., Pogribny, I. P., & Kovalchuk, O. (2007). Role of epigenetic effectors in maintenance of the long-term persistent bystander effect in spleen in vivo. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgm053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.