Adherence, Compliance, and Diet Quality Among Popular Diet Followers
Open accessAbstract
1. To compare diet quality of vegan, vegetarian, paleo, and whole-food plant-based (WFPB) diets; 2. To examine how adherence varies by diet and relates to quality and diet duration; 3. To examine how compliance varies by diet and relates to quality, adherence, and duration. Analysis was conducted on a subsample of ADAPT participants (n = 1392) who completed a demographics and food frequency questionnaire (FFQ; DHQ-II). After excluding implausible energy intake (600 ≤ KCAL < 5,000), the final sample was 1291 (vegan [n = 355]; vegetarian [n = 90]; WFPB [n = 710]; paleo [n = 136]). Diet quality was measured with HEI and AHEI. Duration was categorized as short [<2 years (n = 501)]; moderate [2 to <7 y (n = 200)]; and long-term [7–10 + y (n = 592)]. A self-report adherence score was derived from questions targeting commitment to diet, ranging from 0–32. Compliance score for each diet was derived from reported intakes and DHQ-II (i.e., diet-specific restrictions), and data were %-based standardized. Models were adjusted for age and sex; select models were adjusted for diet duration. Mean (SD) HEI score was high in all plant-based diets, highest for WFPB 76.7(5.8), vegan 75.7 (6.5), vegetarian 72.6 (9.2), compared to paleo 62.5 (8.5); and with a similar ranking for AHEI. Vegans had highest mean adherence 23.5 (2.8) and paleos the lowest 20.0 (3.3). Vegetarians had highest mean compliance 71% (9) and WFPB lowest 53% (10). Compliance was positively associated with HEI score for WFPB and vegan with one percentage point of compliance associated with a 6.4-point increase in HEI for WFPB (SE ± 2, p < .004) and 17.1 for vegan (SE ± 4, p < .0001). For every point increase in compliance, adherence improved (5.4 ± 0.8, p < .0001) in the full sample, and by diet group. Diet duration was significantly associated with adherence in all but vegetarian. No relationship was observed between duration and compliance within diet. WFPB and vegan diets had the highest diet quality; all four had higher mean HEI than reported average in US adults (HEI = 59). Findings suggest that even imperfect compliance to plant-based diets is associated with greater diet quality. Diet adherence is a complex component of eating behavior, however reported adherence appears to predict higher compliance and longer maintenance. USDA Cooperative Agreements; NIFA National Needs Fellowship.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The highly restrictive nature of Paleo and VLCD/ketogenic diets, particularly VLCD/ketogenic diets, likely limits long-term adherence rates.
“However, the highly restrictive nature of both of these diets, particularly the VLCD/ketogenic diets, likely limits long-term adherence rates.49,93”
From Popular dietary patterns: alignment with American Heart Association 2021 dietary guidance: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. (2023) · cites this paper as [93]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gardner, C. D., Vadiveloo, M. K., Petersen, K. S., Anderson, C. A. M., Springfield, S., Van Horn, L., Khera, A., Lamendola, C., Mayo, S. M., Joseph, J. J., et al. (2023) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001146 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Ketone Bodies in Diabetes Mellitus: Friend or Foe?
Veneti, S., Grammatikopoulou, M. G., Kintiraki, E., Mintziori, G., & Goulis, D. G. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15204383 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Finally, the lack of food choices has also been noted, often leading to gradual non-adherence [66,68,69].”
BackgroundExploring culinary diversity to enhance Mediterranean diet adherence: A randomized controlled trial
Shavit, Y., Tepper, S., & Teodorescu, K. (2024) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107597 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Scoring adherence to voluntary restriction diets (SAVoReD) in the ADAPT study
Gerber, S., Jacques, P. F., Staffier, K. L., Karlsen, M. C., Roberts, S. B., Folta, S. C., Economos, C. D., & McKeown, N. M. (2025) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2025.108039 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Gerber, S., Rogers, G., Staffier, K., Karlsen, M., Folta, S., Jacques, P., Naumova, E., & McKeown, N.
- Affiliations
- Tufts University (US)
- Boston University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Current Developments in Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 364
- ISSN
- 2475-2991 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9193519
- OpenAlex
- W4282830675
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Developments in Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Keywords
- diet quality, dietary adherence, vegan diet, vegetarian diet, paleodiet, whole-food plant-based diet, plant-based diet, Healthy Eating Index, Alternative Healthy Eating Index, food frequency questionnaire, dietary intake, dietary restriction, self-reported adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review