Lesions Affecting the Parahippocampal Cortex Yield Spatial Memory Deficits in Humans
Abstract
Anatomical studies in monkeys, and functional imaging and lesion studies in humans, suggest that, within the primate medial temporal neocortex, the parahippocampal cortex (PHC) is particularly involved in spatial tasks. However, evidence for a functional specialization of the PHC regarding its spatial memory functions has so far been lacking. Here, we investigated spatial memory functions of the human perirhinal cortex (PRC) and PHC. Patients with lesions affecting the PRC but sparing the PHC, and patients with lesions affecting both PRC and PHC, performed an oculomotor delayed response task with unpredictably varied memory delays of up to 30 s. Compared to controls, patients with PRC+PHC lesions showed a significant delay-dependent inaccuracy of memory-guided eye movements contralateral to the lesion side, whereas patients with PRC lesions showed no significant inaccuracy. Our results show that the PHC is a critical component for spatial memory in humans and suggest that (i) extrahippocampal spatial memory functions of the medial temporal lobe may not be equally distributed in the medial temporal neocortex, but may be largely confined to the PHC, and (ii) damage to connections between cortices involved in spatial cognition and rostral regions of the temporal lobe is unlikely to account for the observed spatial memory deficits with PHC lesions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The parahippocampal gyrus (BM36) covers the entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices in the medial temporal lobe of the brain, playing critical roles in memory encoding and retrieval, as well as spatial navigation.
“The parahippocampal gyrus (BM36) covers the entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices in the medial temporal lobe of the brain, playing critical roles in memory encoding and retrieval (61), as well as spatial navigation (62, 63).”
From Comprehensive characterization of the transcriptional landscape in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brains (2025) · cites this paper as [62]
Cites
Bohbot, V. D., Kalina, M., Stepankova, K., Spackova, N., Petrides, M., & Nadel, L. (1998) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00161-9 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., Smallwood, J., & Spreng, R. N. (2014) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12360 · Cited by 2,102 · see citing works
Harrison, N. A., Doeller, C. F., Voon, V., Burgess, N., & Critchley, H. D. (2014) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.01.005 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Brain structures implicated in inflammation-associated depression
Harrison, N. A. (2016) · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2016_30 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Comprehensive characterization of the transcriptional landscape in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brains
Chen, C., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Hong, W., Karahan, H., Wang, J., Li, W., Diao, L., Yu, M., Saykin, A. J., et al. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adn1927 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“The parahippocampal gyrus (BM36) covers the entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocam-pal cortices in the medial temporal lobe of the brain, playing critical roles in memory encoding and retrieval ( 61 ), as well as spatial navigation ( 62 , 63 ).”
- Authors
- Ploner, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Ploner, C. J.
- ORCID
- Ploner, C. J.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1211-1216
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2019959151
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Keywords
- parahippocampal cortex, perirhinal cortex, spatial memory, medial temporal lobe, memory delay, functional specialization, brain lesions
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Diseases, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Reference Values, Saccades, Space Perception, Parahippocampal Gyrus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review