Cited by 6Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchRNA regulation and disease

Comprehensive characterization of the transcriptional landscape in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brains

Open access
Chen, Chengxuan, Zhang, Zhao, Liu, Yuan, Hong, Wei, Karahan, Hande, Wang, Jun, Li, Wenbo, Diao, Lixia +5 more·2025·Science Advances

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the leading dementia among the elderly with complex origins. Despite extensive investigation into the AD-associated protein-coding genes, the involvement of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) and posttranscriptional modification (PTM) in AD pathogenesis remains unclear. Here, we comprehensively characterized the landscape of ncRNAs and PTM events in 1460 samples across six brain regions sourced from the Mount Sinai/JJ Peters VA Medical Center Brain Bank Study and Mayo cohorts, encompassing 33,321 long ncRNAs, 92,897 enhancer RNAs, 53,763 alternative polyadenylation events, and 900,221 A-to-I RNA editing events. We additionally identified 25,351 aberrantly expressed ncRNAs and altered PTM events associated with AD traits and further identified the corresponding protein-coding genes to construct regulatory networks. Furthermore, we developed a user-friendly data portal, ADatlas, facilitating users in exploring our results. Our study aims to establish a comprehensive data platform for ncRNAs and PTMs in AD to advance related research.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study comprehensively characterized noncoding RNA and posttranscriptional modification landscapes across six AD brain regions using 1,460 RNA-seq samples from the MSBB and Mayo cohorts. It identified thousands of AD-trait-associated lncRNAs, eRNAs, APA events, and A-to-I editing sites, and released the ADatlas portal for browsing these results.

Key findings

  • Across six brain regions, the authors identified 33,321 lncRNAs, 92,897 eRNAs, 53,763 APA events, and 900,221 A-to-I editing sites; they further identified 25,351 AD-related ncRNA/PTM events, including 1,462 lncRNAs, 1,930 eRNAs, 556 APA events, and 21,403 A-to-I editing events.
  • Regulatory network analysis linked 132,750 ncRNAs/PTMs to protein-coding genes, comprising 31,318 lncRNAs, 50,718 eRNAs, 29,686 APA events, and 21,028 A-to-I editing events.
  • They found 308 ncRNAs and 158 PTM events consistently changed in at least two brain regions, with 131 consistently altered across both cohorts; 78.6% of shared DE lncRNAs and 86.9% of shared DE eRNAs were found in severe AD cases.
  • eRNA target genes were supported by Hi-C for 76.9% of interactions in MSBB and 63.5% in Mayo; APA events correlated with gene expression for ~20% of events, ranging from 17.1% in MSBB BM36 to 21.2% in Mayo CBE.

Methods

  • RNA-seq BAM files, clinical features, and mRNA expression data were obtained from the MSBB and Mayo cohorts via AMP-AD, covering six brain regions: BM10, BM22, BM36, BM44, TCX, and CBE.
  • lncRNAs were quantified with StringTie FPKM; eRNAs were defined using ENCODE/Roadmap/FANTOM enhancer annotations; APA was quantified with DaPars; A-to-I editing was annotated with ANNOVAR and REDIportal.
  • Differential expression/alteration used linear models with covariates (sex, age, race, batch, PMI, RIN), Wilcoxon tests, Spearman correlations, GSEA, and coverage-dependent permutation tests; results were deployed in the ADatlas portal.

Limitations

  • The paper states that cohort disparities may bias interpretation: MSBB used rRNA depletion while Mayo used polyA selection, MSBB used single-end and Mayo paired-end sequencing, Mayo had higher sequencing depth, and AD/control definitions differed between cohorts.
  • The paper states limited ethnicity representation: about 70% of MSBB samples and all Mayo samples were of European ancestry, restricting generalizability to other populations.
  • The paper notes uncertainty about whether transcriptomic changes cause or result from AD pathology, and further studies are warranted; this is also evident from the cross-sectional postmortem design.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.adn1927

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

21 of 39 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    The Mayo cohort includes 545 samples from temporal cortex (TCX) and cerebellum (CBE).

    “while the Mayo cohort includes 545 samples from temporal cortex (TCX) and cerebellum (CBE) (Fig. 1, A and B, and table S1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] M. Allen, M. M. Carrasquillo, C. Funk, B. D. Heavner, F. Zou, C. S. Younkin, J. D. Burgess, H.-S. Chai, J. Crook, J. A. Eddy, H. Li, B. Logsdon, M. A. Peters, K. K. Dang, X. Wang, D. Serie, C. Wang, T. Nguyen, S. Lincoln, K. Malphrus, G. Bisceglio, M. Li, T. E. Golde, L. M. Mangravite, Y. Asmann, N. D. Price, R. C. Petersen, N. R. Graff-Radford, D. W. Dickson, S. G. Younkin, N. Ertekin-Taner, Human whole genome genotype and transcriptome data for Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases. Sci. Data 3, 160089 (2016). 27727239 PMC5058336 source

      The Background & Summary identifies a Mayo RNAseq cohort with samples from temporal cortex (TCX) and cerebellum (CER), but gives its size as 556, not 545. Methods > Study Populations specifies 278 samples from each region. Our copy therefore supports the brain regions but not the stated sample count; no page numbers are available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The MSBB cohort includes 915 samples from four brain regions: BM10, BM22, BM36, and BM44.

    “The MSBB cohort includes 915 samples from four brain regions: the anterior prefrontal cortex (BM10), superior temporal gyrus (BM22), parahippocampal gyrus (BM36), and inferior frontal gyrus (BM44);”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] M. Wang, N. D. Beckmann, P. Roussos, E. Wang, X. Zhou, Q. Wang, C. Ming, R. Neff, W. Ma, J. F. Fullard, M. E. Hauberg, J. Bendl, M. A. Peters, B. Logsdon, P. Wang, M. Mahajan, L. M. Mangravite, E. B. Dammer, D. M. Duong, J. J. Lah, N. T. Seyfried, A. I. Levey, J. D. Buxbaum, M. Ehrlich, S. Gandy, P. Katsel, V. Haroutunian, E. Schadt, B. Zhang, The Mount Sinai cohort of large-scale genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Data 5, 180185 (2018). 30204156 PMC6132187 source

      The Methods section, “Human brain tissue preparation” (page unavailable), identifies the four sampled regions as BM10, BM22, BM36 and BM44, with the corresponding anatomical names; it calls BM10 the frontal pole. Our copy does not substantiate the stated total of 915 samples, so the regional description is supported but the sample count is not verified. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    AD pathology spreads from the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus to other connected medial temporal lobe regions and eventually throughout the brain, including the CBE in late clinical stages.

    “Neuroimaging studies have suggested that the pathology spreads from these regions to the other connected medial temporal lobe regions and eventually throughout the brain, including the CBE in late clinical stages (71–73).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [71] H. Hampel, J. Hardy, K. Blennow, C. Chen, G. Perry, S. H. Kim, V. L. Villemagne, P. Aisen, M. Vendruscolo, T. Iwatsubo, C. L. Masters, M. Cho, L. Lannfelt, J. L. Cummings, A. Vergallo, The amyloid-β pathway in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Psychiatry 26, 5481– 5503 (2021). 34456336 PMC8758495 source

      The tauopathy section describes tau spreading from the entorhinal cortex to other brain regions, and the Early History section says amyloid-β deposition eventually reaches the cerebellum in late clinical stages. But the paper does not describe the claimed continuous route through connected medial temporal regions to the cerebellum; its neuroimaging-supported account of amyloid-β accumulation begins in neocortical association areas, not the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus. No page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [72] D. R. Thal, U. Rüb, M. Orantes, H. Braak, Phases of Aβ-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology 58, 1791– 1800 (2002). 12084879 source
    • cites [73] G. B. Frisoni, N. C. Fox, C. R. Jack Jr., P. Scheltens, P. M. Thompson, The clinical use of structural MRI in Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 6, 67– 77 (2010). 20139996 PMC2938772 source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) describes early involvement of the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus followed by progressive neocortical damage. The 'Atrophy as a neurodegeneration marker' section describes later atrophy in temporal, parietal and frontal neocortices. Our copy does not establish the claimed spread through other connected medial temporal regions or into the CBE in late-stage AD; its mention of cerebellar atrophy concerns multiple system atrophy, not AD. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Four of these genes were involved in AD-related pathways such as Ca2+ permeability [GRIA2 and GRIK2], cellular dysfunction, and protein stability [NOVA1 and GIPC1].

    “Four of these genes were involved in AD-related pathways such as Ca2+ permeability [GRIA2 (55) and GRIK2 (29)], cellular dysfunction, and protein stability [NOVA1 (56) and GIPC1 (57)].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [55] B. Sommer, M. Köhler, R. Sprengel, P. H. Seeburg, RNA editing in brain controls a determinant of ion flow in glutamate-gated channels. Cell 67, 11– 19 (1991). 1717158 source
    • cites [29] K. Khermesh, A. M. D’Erchia, M. Barak, A. Annese, C. Wachtel, E. Y. Levanon, E. Picardi, E. Eisenberg, Reduced levels of protein recoding by A-to-I RNA editing in Alzheimer’s disease. RNA 22, 290– 302 (2016). 26655226 PMC4712678 source

      The Discussion reports reduced GRIA2 RNA editing in Alzheimer’s disease, supporting GRIA2’s relevance to AD. The passages found do not link GRIA2 to Ca2+ permeability. In the printed sentence, the other genes have separate citations and are not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [56] M. Irimia, A. Denuc, J. L. Ferran, B. Pernaute, L. Puelles, S. W. Roy, J. Garcia-Fernàndez, G. Marfany, Evolutionarily conserved A-to-I editing increases protein stability of the alternative splicing factor Nova1. RNA Biol. 9, 12– 21 (2012). 22258141 source

      The Results (p. 5) show that A-to-I editing stabilizes NOVA1 protein by reducing proteasome-mediated degradation, supporting the NOVA1–protein-stability connection. The cited paper does not establish that this mechanism is an AD-related pathway or link NOVA1 to AD-related cellular dysfunction. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    PART1 is down-regulated in brain regions BM22 and BM36.

    “We also detected the down-regulation of PART1 in brain regions BM22 and BM36, which is consistent with previous studies using gene expression data from the Gene Expression Omnibus dataset (74).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [74] C. Huaying, J. Xing, J. Luya, N. Linhui, S. Di, D. Xianjun, A signature of five long non-coding RNAs for predicting the prognosis of Alzheimer’s disease based on competing endogenous RNA networks. Front. Aging Neurosci. 12, 598606 (2021). 33584243 PMC7876075 source

      The Results section, “Diagnostic Power of Dysregulated lncRNAs in AD” (page unavailable), reports that PART1 was downregulated in serum samples from patients with AD and followed a similar trend in the bioinformatics analysis. It does not report PART1 downregulation specifically in brain regions BM22 and BM36, so the cited paper supports the direction of the finding but not the claimed locations. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
  • May combine two claims. 19
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    MAVS is associated with neuroinflammation and synaptic loss in AD through interferon I-driven inflammation.

    “The eRNA ENSR00000133987 putatively targets the Mitochondrial Antiviral Signaling Protein (MAVS) gene, which is associated with neuroinflammation and synaptic loss in AD through interferon I–driven inflammation (Fig. 3E) (52, 53).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [52] M. Eshraghi, A. Adlimoghaddam, A. Mahmoodzadeh, F. Sharifzad, H. Yasavoli-Sharahi, S. Lorzadeh, B. C. Albensi, S. Ghavami, Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis: Role of autophagy and mitophagy focusing in microglia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 3330 (2021). 33805142 PMC8036323 source
    • cites [53] L. Nobre, D. Wise, D. Ron, R. Volmer, Modulation of innate immune signalling by lipid-mediated MAVS transmembrane domain oligomerization. PLOS ONE 10, e0136883 (2015). 26317833 PMC4552940 source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) describes MAVS-mediated type I interferon signalling in an antiviral response, and the Results (page unavailable) report increased interferon-β transcription under the tested conditions. The paper does not establish that MAVS causes neuroinflammation or synaptic loss in Alzheimer’s disease through that pathway. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The parahippocampal gyrus (BM36) covers the entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices in the medial temporal lobe of the brain, playing critical roles in memory encoding and retrieval, as well as spatial navigation.

    “The parahippocampal gyrus (BM36) covers the entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices in the medial temporal lobe of the brain, playing critical roles in memory encoding and retrieval (61), as well as spatial navigation (62, 63).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [61] V. D. Bohbot, M. Kalina, K. Stepankova, N. Spackova, M. Petrides, L. Nadel, Spatial memory deficits in patients with lesions to the right hippocampus and to the right parahippocampal cortex. Neuropsychologia 36, 1217– 1238 (1998). 9842767 source
    • cites [62] C. J. Ploner, B. M. Gaymard, S. Rivaud-Péchoux, M. Baulac, S. Clémenceau, S. Samson, C. Pierrot-Deseilligny, Lesions affecting the parahippocampal cortex yield spatial memory deficits in humans. Cereb. Cortex 10, 1211– 1216 (2000). 11073870 source
    • cites [63] E. M. LaFlamme, H. F. Waguespack, P. A. Forcelli, L. Malkova, The parahippocampal cortex and its functional connection with the hippocampus are critical for nonnavigational spatial memory in macaques. Cereb. Cortex 31, 2251– 2267 (2021). 33270817 PMC7945022 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) links the parahippocampal cortex to retrieval of spatial information and says it is necessary, with the hippocampus, for complex spatial maps. The Introduction (page unavailable) defines that cortex as areas TH and TF, but the paper does not identify BM36 or say that the parahippocampal gyrus encompasses the entorhinal and perirhinal cortices. Its evidence for memory encoding is also narrower than the general claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Language problems and impairment in executive functions typically emerge in the early to middle stages of AD.

    “Language problems and impairment in executive functions typically emerge in the early to middle stages of AD (68, 69).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [68] B. Klimova, P. Maresova, M. Valis, J. Hort, K. Kuca, Alzheimer’s disease and language impairments: Social intervention and medical treatment. Clin. Interv. Aging 10, 1401– 1407 (2015). 26346123 PMC4555976 source

      The Language impairments in AD section says language difficulties occur in the first phase and worsen in the moderate phase. The Early (mild) and Middle (moderate) phase sections also describe difficulties with complex activities and attention, but the paper does not establish that impairment in executive functions generally emerges in those stages. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [69] S. Baudic, G. D. Barba, M. C. Thibaudet, A. Smagghe, P. Remy, L. Traykov, Executive function deficits in early Alzheimer’s disease and their relations with episodic memory. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 21, 15– 21 (2006). 16125364 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    COPA is an AD-related gene that can reduce amyloid plaques in the cortex and hippocampus of AD mouse models.

    “Included were AD-related gene COPA, a gene that can reduce amyloid plaques in the cortex and hippocampus of the AD mouse models (58), and SUMO1, a useful AD marker whose expression level in plasma is tightly associated with AD pathology (59).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58] Y. Yang, X. Wang, W. Ju, L. Sun, H. Zhang, Genetic and expression analysis of COPI genes and Alzheimer’s disease susceptibility. Front. Genet. 10, 866 (2019). 31608112 PMC6761859 source

      The Introduction identifies COPA among COPI genes previously associated with AD risk and reports that COPI-dependent trafficking reduced amyloid plaques in the cortex and hippocampus of AD mouse models. It does not establish that COPA specifically caused that reduction. The paper’s own gene-based test also found no significant association between COPA and AD susceptibility. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    These regions are affected by AD pathologies starting from the early stages of the disease.

    “These are the regions that are affected by AD pathologies starting from the early stages of the disease (64–66).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [64] D. Berron, J. W. Vogel, P. S. Insel, J. B. Pereira, L. Xie, L. E. M. Wisse, P. A. Yushkevich, S. Palmqvist, N. Mattsson-Carlgren, E. Stomrud, R. Smith, O. Strandberg, O. Hansson, Early stages of tau pathology and its associations with functional connectivity, atrophy and memory. Brain 144, 2771– 2783 (2021). 33725124 PMC8557349 source
    • cites [65] M. Schöll, S. N. Lockhart, D. R. Schonhaut, J. P. O’Neil, M. Janabi, R. Ossenkoppele, S. L. Baker, J. W. Vogel, J. Faria, H. D. Schwimmer, G. D. Rabinovici, W. J. Jagust, PET imaging of tau deposition in the aging human brain. Neuron 89, 971– 982 (2016). 26938442 PMC4779187 source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) says AD-related tau pathology may begin in medial temporal structures, especially the transentorhinal cortex. This supports early involvement of those regions, but the source does not establish that the unspecified “these regions” are all affected by AD pathologies from the early stages; its proposed sequence places other regions later. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [66] G. W. Van Hoesen, J. C. Augustinack, J. Dierking, S. J. Redman, R. Thangavel, The parahippocampal gyrus in Alzheimer’s disease: Clinical and preclinical neuroanatomical correlates. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 911, 254– 274 (2000). 10911879 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    To ensure sufficient statistical power, editing sites were kept only if they had at least three edited reads in at least 3 samples and no less than 30 samples with coverage as 10 in a brain region.

    “To ensure sufficient statistical power, we only kept editing sites with at least three edited reads in at least 3 samples and no less than 30 samples with coverage as 10 in a brain region (18).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] L. Han, L. Diao, S. Yu, X. Xu, J. Li, R. Zhang, Y. Yang, H. M. J. Werner, A. K. Eterovic, Y. Yuan, J. Li, N. Nair, R. Minelli, Y. H. Tsang, L. W. T. Cheung, K. J. Jeong, J. Roszik, Z. Ju, S. E. Woodman, Y. Lu, K. L. Scott, J. B. Li, G. B. Mills, H. Liang, The genomic landscape and clinical relevance of A-to-I RNA editing in human cancers. Cancer Cell 28, 515– 528 (2015). 26439496 PMC4605878 source

      The Experimental Procedures section gives both thresholds: at least three edited reads in at least three samples, followed by at least 30 samples with coverage ≥10. But it applies them per tissue or tumor type in a cancer study, not specifically in a brain region. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In BM36, altered A-to-I editing sites include GRIA2 (R/G and Q/R), GRIK2 (Q/R), and NOVA1 (S/G).

    “For example, in BM36, we identified well characterized A-to-I editing sites of GRIA2 (R/G and Q/R) (55, 75, 76) and GRIK2 (Q/R) (29, 77), as well as previously reported editing sites in NOVA1 (S/G) (29, 56) (Fig. 5D).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [55] B. Sommer, M. Köhler, R. Sprengel, P. H. Seeburg, RNA editing in brain controls a determinant of ion flow in glutamate-gated channels. Cell 67, 11– 19 (1991). 1717158 source
    • cites [75] S. Akbarian, M. A. Smith, E. G. Jones, Editing for an AMPA receptor subunit RNA in prefrontal cortex and striatum in Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington’s disease and schizophrenia. Brain Res. 699, 297– 304 (1995). 8616634 source
    • cites [76] H. Lomeli, J. Mosbacher, T. Melcher, T. Höger, J. R. Geiger, T. Kuner, H. Monyer, M. Higuchi, A. Bach, P. H. Seeburg, Control of kinetic properties of AMPA receptor channels by nuclear RNA editing. Science 266, 1709– 1713 (1994). 7992055 source
    • cites [29] K. Khermesh, A. M. D’Erchia, M. Barak, A. Annese, C. Wachtel, E. Y. Levanon, E. Picardi, E. Eisenberg, Reduced levels of protein recoding by A-to-I RNA editing in Alzheimer’s disease. RNA 22, 290– 302 (2016). 26655226 PMC4712678 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports reduced editing of GRIA2 in the temporal and frontal lobes of Alzheimer’s disease samples. It does not identify BM36 or substantiate the specified GRIA2 R/G and Q/R, GRIK2 Q/R, and NOVA1 S/G sites in BM36. Searches for BM36, GRIK2, and NOVA1 found no matching results in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [77] S. Gurung, A. J. Evans, K. A. Wilkinson, J. M. Henley, ADAR2-mediated Q/R editing of GluK2 regulates kainate receptor upscaling in response to suppression of synaptic activity. J. Cell Sci. 131, (2018). PMC6307878 30559217 source

      The Results section, “Suppression of synaptic activity decreases ADAR2 levels” (page unavailable), reports GluK2/GRIK2 Q/R editing, supporting that editing-site identification. The cited paper does not address NOVA1 S/G editing, although it is also cited for that site. The BM36 finding is presented as the citing authors’ own result, not as a finding from this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [56] M. Irimia, A. Denuc, J. L. Ferran, B. Pernaute, L. Puelles, S. W. Roy, J. Garcia-Fernàndez, G. Marfany, Evolutionarily conserved A-to-I editing increases protein stability of the alternative splicing factor Nova1. RNA Biol. 9, 12– 21 (2012). 22258141 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In Mayo, some lncRNA-enriched functional pathways are universal in both TCX and CBE (e.g., oxidative phosphorylation in metabolism), while some pathways are brain region-specific (e.g., synaptic vesicle cycle in nervous system and diseases).

    “In the Mayo cohort, we observed a similar pattern that some lncRNA-enriched functional pathways are universal in both TCX and CBE (e.g., oxidative phosphorylation in metabolism), while some pathways are in a brain region–specific manner (e.g., synaptic vesicle cycle in nervous system and diseases) (fig. S1H).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    LINC02458 showed significantly reduced expression levels in AD samples across all cerebral cortex regions (four MSBB brain regions and Mayo TCX), but not in CBE.

    “For example, LINC02552 and LINC02458 showed significantly reduced expression levels in AD samples across all cerebral cortex regions [four brain regions in the MSBB cohort and in the TCX brain region (Fig. 2B), but not in the CBE, in the Mayo cohort].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    LINC02552 showed significantly reduced expression levels in AD samples across all cerebral cortex regions (four MSBB brain regions and Mayo TCX), but not in CBE.

    “For example, LINC02552 and LINC02458 showed significantly reduced expression levels in AD samples across all cerebral cortex regions [four brain regions in the MSBB cohort and in the TCX brain region (Fig. 2B), but not in the CBE, in the Mayo cohort].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In Mayo, 238,847 RNA editing sites were detected in TCX and 414,865 in CBE.

    “In the Mayo cohort, we detected 238,847 RNA editing sites in TCX and 414,865 in CBE, respectively (fig. S4A).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The numbers of APA events detected were 6873 in BM10, 7558 in BM22, 6776 in BM36, and 7461 in BM44 in the MSBB cohort.

    “The numbers of APA events are 6873 in BM10, 7558 in BM22, 6776 in BM36, and 7461 in BM44 of the MSBB cohort and 12,670 in TCX and 12,425 in CEB of the Mayo cohort, respectively (fig. S3A).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The numbers of APA events detected were 12,670 in TCX and 12,425 in CEB in the Mayo cohort.

    “The numbers of APA events are 6873 in BM10, 7558 in BM22, 6776 in BM36, and 7461 in BM44 of the MSBB cohort and 12,670 in TCX and 12,425 in CEB of the Mayo cohort, respectively (fig. S3A).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In MSBB, the numbers of RNA editing sites detected were 82,485 in BM10, 51,520 in BM22, 67,054 in BM36, and 45,450 in BM44.

    “In the MSBB cohort, we identified a total of 82,485, 51,520, 67,054, and 45,450 RNA editing sites from BM10, BM22, BM36, and BM44, respectively (fig. S4A).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the MSBB cohort, around 70% of samples are of European ancestry, while the Mayo cohort consists entirely of European ancestry samples.

    “In the MSBB cohort, around 70% of samples are of European ancestry, while the Mayo cohort consists entirely of European ancestry samples (table S1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    ENSR00000011444 targets CHI3L2 and ENSR00000133987 targets MAVS.

    “We demonstrated examples of DE eRNAs, including ENSR00000011444 targeting CHI3L2 and ENSR00000133987 targeting MAVS, both implicated as risk genes in AD (Fig. 3, D and E).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    LINC02552 has been reported to be associated with genes involved in protein homeostasis pathways.

    “Among them, LINC02552 has been reported to be associated with genes involved in protein homeostasis pathways (41).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41] X. Zhou, J. Xu, Identification of Alzheimer’s disease-associated long noncoding RNAs. Neurobiol. Aging 36, 2925– 2931 (2015). 26318290 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SUMO1 is a useful AD marker whose expression level in plasma is tightly associated with AD pathology.

    “Included were AD-related gene COPA, a gene that can reduce amyloid plaques in the cortex and hippocampus of the AD mouse models (58), and SUMO1, a useful AD marker whose expression level in plasma is tightly associated with AD pathology (59).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59] X. Chen, Y. Zhang, Q. Wang, Y. Qin, X. Yang, Z. Xing, Y. Shen, H. Wu, Y. Qi, The function of SUMOylation and its crucial roles in the development of neurological diseases. FASEB J. 35, e21510 (2021). 33710677 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The inferior frontal gyrus (BM44) plays a role in language processing and executive functions.

    “Previous research indicates that the inferior frontal gyrus (BM44) plays a role in language processing and executive functions (67).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [67] A. R. Aron, T. W. Robbins, R. A. Poldrack, Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 170– 177 (2004). 15050513 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The earliest AD pathological changes are detected in the entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus, both located in the parahippocampal gyrus.

    “The earliest pathological changes are detected in the entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus, both located in the parahippocampal gyrus (70).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] H. Braak, E. Braak, Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol 82, 239– 259 (1991). 1759558 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The criteria used for defining AD and control groups differ between the two cohorts, potentially influencing the composition of samples analyzed and introducing variability in the observed results.

    “Last, the criteria used for defining AD and control groups differ between the two cohorts (see Materials and Methods), potentially influencing the composition of samples analyzed and introducing variability in the observed results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    A linear model was used to detect DE eRNAs among AD stages, considering sex, age, race, batch, PMI, and RIN as covariates.

    “We use a linear model to detect DE eRNAs among AD stages, considering sex, age, race, batch, PMI, and RIN as covariates, and use stepAIC from MASS R package to select the best model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    A linear model was used to detect DE lncRNAs, considering sex, age, race, batch, PMI, and RIN as covariates.

    “We subsequently used a linear model to detect DE lncRNAs, considering sex, age, race, batch, postmortem interval (PMI), and RNA integrity number (RIN) as covariates, and used stepAIC from the R package MASS for optimal model selection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    ncRNAs and PTMs play critical roles in AD.

    “Together, our results suggest critical roles of ncRNAs and PTMs in AD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
24 of 24
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Pathological changes start to occur decades before clinical symptoms develop in patients with AD.

    “The pathological changes start to occur decades before the clinical symptoms develop in patients with AD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    CHI3L2 and MAVS are implicated as risk genes in AD.

    “We demonstrated examples of DE eRNAs, including ENSR00000011444 targeting CHI3L2 and ENSR00000133987 targeting MAVS, both implicated as risk genes in AD (Fig. 3, D and E).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Genetic variations, expression patterns, and disease risks may differ across populations.

    “For instance, genetic variations, expression patterns, and disease risks may differ across populations, and results from European ancestry samples may not necessarily represent other populations accurately.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Two different totals for detectable MSBB eRNAs

    Minor

    The MSBB eRNA results give the total number of detectable eRNAs as both 25,375 and 25,373.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, C., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Hong, W., Karahan, H., Wang, J., Li, W., Diao, L., Yu, M., Saykin, A. J., Nho, K., Kim, J., & Han, L.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Chengxuan
  • Zhang, Zhao
  • Liu, Yuan
  • Han, Leng
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2025-01-03
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
eadn1927-eadn1927
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406028021
Cited by
6
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ag006786-38, 5p01ag003949-40, 5u19ag024904-18, 5u19ag074879-03, 5p50ag016574-20)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30 AG072976, P30AG010133, R01 AG019771, U01‐AG006786, P01-AG003949, U19-AG074879, P50AG025711, U01 AG046139, U19-AG024904, R01AG018023, R03 AG070417, P50‐AG016574, T32AG071444, R01AG057739, R01 AG068193, R01AG032990, P30AG019610, P01 AG 017216, R37AG057739, R01AG082132, R01AG077829, U01AG072177, U01AG068057)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R56 HL142704, R01HL142704, U01HL156059)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01 HG011633)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA262623)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R21 GM132778, R01GM136922)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS080820, U24NS072026)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE029014, R03DE025873, K01 DE026561)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01 LM013463, R01 LM012535)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, non-coding RNA, long non-coding RNA, enhancer RNA, alternative polyadenylation, A-to-I RNA editing, post-transcriptional modification, transcriptome, brain regions, regulatory networks, data portal
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Male, Transcription, Genetic, RNA Editing, Gene Expression Profiling, RNA, Untranslated, Gene Regulatory Networks, Transcriptome, RNA, Long Noncoding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-17.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-17.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review