Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 74

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Color Contrast in Macaque V1

Conway, B. R.·2002·Cerebral Cortex
DOI 10.1093/cercor/12.9.915
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We explored the neural basis for spatial color contrast (red looks redder surrounded by green) and temporal color contrast (red looks redder if preceded by green) in primary visual cortex (V1) of the alert macaque. Using pairs of stimuli, we found a subset of neurons that gave stronger responses to sequences of red and green spots and stronger responses to adjacent red and green spots. These cells combined their cone inputs linearly: for a red-ON-center cell, the sum of the OFF response to green and the ON response to red predicted the peak response to red preceded by green. These 'color' cells, which could underlie hue discrimination because they show cone opponency, could mediate spatial and temporal color contrast. In contrast, the majority of cortical cells, which do not show overt cone opponency but which are often orientation tuned and/or direction selective, are by themselves incapable of mediating hue discrimination. The remarkable degree of specialization shown by cells in V1, especially that of the double-opponent color cells, is discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/12.9.915

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 74

Metadata

Authors
Conway, B. R.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
915-925
ISSN
1460-2199
DOI
10.1093/cercor/12.9.915
Cited by
74
References
55

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.