Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spectral sensitivity of cones of the monkey Macaca fascicularis

Baylor, D A, Nunn, B J, Schnapf, J L·1987·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Spectral sensitivities of cones in the retina of cynomolgus monkeys were determined by recording photocurrents from single outer segments with a suction electrode. 2. The amplitude and shape of the response to a flash depended upon the number of photons absorbed but not the wave‐length, so that the 'Principle of Univariance' was obeyed. 3. Spectra were obtained from five 'blue', twenty 'green', and sixteen 'red' cones. The wave‐lengths of maximum sensitivity were approximately 430, 531 and 561 nm, respectively. 4. The spectra of the three types of cones had similar shapes when plotted on a log wave number scale, and were fitted by an empirical expression. 5. There was no evidence for the existence of subclasses of cones with different spectral sensitivities. Within a class, the positions of the individual spectra on the wave‐length axis showed a standard deviation of less than 1.5 nm. 6. Psychophysical results on human colour matching (Stiles & Burch, 1955; Stiles & Burch, 1959) were well predicted from the spectral sensitivities of the monkey cones. After correction for pre‐retinal absorption and pigment self‐screening, the spectra of the red and green cones matched the respective pi 5 and pi 4 mechanisms of Stiles (1953, 1959).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016691

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The absorption spectra of primate photoreceptors assume a common shape when plotted on a normalized wave number axis.

    “the absorption spectra of primate photoreceptors assume a common shape when plotted on a normalized wave number axis (wave number divided by wave number of maximum sensitivity) (Baylor et al., 1987, Lamb, 1995, Mansfield, 1985)”

    From The genetics of normal and defective color vision (2011) · cites this paper as Baylor et al., 1987

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Alpern M. Lack of uniformity in colour matching. J Physiol. 1979 Mar;288:85–105. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baylor D. A., Nunn B. J., Schnapf J. L. The photocurrent, noise and spectral sensitivity of rods of the monkey Macaca fascicularis. J Physiol. 1984 Dec;357:575–607. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. Baylor D. A. Photoreceptor signals and vision. Proctor lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987 Jan;28(1):34–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowmaker J. K., Dartnall H. J., Mollon J. D. Microspectrophotometric demonstration of four classes of photoreceptor in an old world primate, Macaca fascicularis. J Physiol. 1980 Jan;298:131–143. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  5. Cornwall M. C., MacNichol E. F., Jr, Fein A. Absorptance and spectral sensitivity measurements of rod photoreceptors of the tiger salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum. Vision Res. 1984;24(11):1651–1659. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90323-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. Dartnall H. J., Bowmaker J. K., Mollon J. D. Human visual pigments: microspectrophotometric results from the eyes of seven persons. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1983 Nov 22;220(1218):115–130. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1983.0091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. De Valois R. L., Morgan H. C., Polson M. C., Mead W. R., Hull E. M. Psychophysical studies of monkey vision. I. Macaque luminosity and color vision tests. Vision Res. 1974 Jan;14(1):53–67. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(74)90116-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. Greenberg A. D., Honig B., Ebrey T. G. Wavelength dependence of the bandwidths of visual pigment spectra. Nature. 1975 Oct 30;257(5529):823–824. doi: 10.1038/257823a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. Honig B., Greenberg A. D., Dinur U., Ebrey T. G. Visual-pigment spectra: implications of the protonation of the retinal Schiff base. Biochemistry. 1976 Oct 19;15(21):4593–4599. doi: 10.1021/bi00666a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. Lamb T. D., McNaughton P. A., Yau K. W. Spatial spread of activation and background desensitization in toad rod outer segments. J Physiol. 1981;319:463–496. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. Mansfield R. J., Levine J. S., Lipetz L. E., Collins B. A., Raymond G., MacNichol E. F., Jr Blue-sensitive cones in the primate retina: microspectrophotometry of the visual pigment. Exp Brain Res. 1984;56(2):389–394. doi: 10.1007/BF00236296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. Naka K. I., Rushton W. A. S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae). J Physiol. 1966 Aug;185(3):536–555. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. Nathans J., Thomas D., Hogness D. S. Molecular genetics of human color vision: the genes encoding blue, green, and red pigments. Science. 1986 Apr 11;232(4747):193–202. doi: 10.1126/science.2937147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. Neitz J., Jacobs G. H. Polymorphism of the long-wavelength cone in normal human colour vision. Nature. 1986 Oct 16;323(6089):623–625. doi: 10.1038/323623a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  15. Nunn B. J., Schnapf J. L., Baylor D. A. Spectral sensitivity of single cones in the retina of Macaca fascicularis. Nature. 1984 May 17;309(5965):264–266. doi: 10.1038/309264a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. RUSHTON W. A. A CONE PIGMENT IN THE PROTANOPE. J Physiol. 1963 Sep;168:345–359. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. RUSHTON W. A. A FOVEAL PIGMENT IN THE DEUTERANOPE. J Physiol. 1965 Jan;176:24–37. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. Schnapf J. L., Baylor D. A. How photoreceptor cells respond to light. Sci Am. 1987 Apr;256(4):40–47. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0487-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. Schnapf J. L., Kraft T. W., Baylor D. A. Spectral sensitivity of human cone photoreceptors. 1987 Jan 29-Feb 4Nature. 325(6103):439–441. doi: 10.1038/325439a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. Smith V. C., Pokorny J. Spectral sensitivity of color-blind observers and the cone photopigments. Vision Res. 1972 Dec;12(12):2059–2071. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(72)90058-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. Smith V. C., Pokorny J. Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm. Vision Res. 1975 Feb;15(2):161–171. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(75)90203-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  22. WALD G., BROWN P. K., SMITH P. H. Iodopsin. J Gen Physiol. 1955 May 20;38(5):623–681. doi: 10.1085/jgp.38.5.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baylor, D. A., Nunn, B. J., & Schnapf, J. L.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-09
Volume
390
Issue
1
Pages
145-160
ISSN
  • 0022-3751
  • 1469-7793
Cited by
344
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review