The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence for Visual Cortical Area Homologs in Cat and Macaque Monkey
Abstract
The maps of visuotopically discrete visual cerebral cortical areas in the cat and the macaque monkey are compared and gaps in knowledge are identified that limit such comparisons. Cat areas 17, 18, and 19 can be equated with macaque areas V1, V2, and V3, respectively, based on criteria of relative position in the cortical mantle, internal organization of visual field representations, and trans- and subcortical connections. Using these same criteria, a visual area on the medial bank of the lateral suprasylvian sulcus (area PMLS) in the cat can be equated with macaque area V5. The equivalences are supported by data on neuronal receptive field properties and the contributions the areas make to visual behavior. Although the data are scanty for most other visual areas, there are enough data tentatively to equate collectively cat areas 20a and 20b with macaque areas TF and TH and to liken cat areas 21a and 21b with macaque area V4. What is not clear is if there is a region in cat that is equivalent to area TE in the macaque monkey. If there is, it likely lies on the banks of the posterior suprasylvian sulcus between areas 20 and 21 and the polysensory cortex of the posterior ectosylvian gyrus. Knowledge gained from prior research on macaque areas V4 and TE can be used to formulate specific additional investigations of cat area 21 and the uncharted posterior suprasylvian sulcus. In addition, prior investigations carried out on cat area 20 can be used to devise specific explorations of macaque areas TF and TH.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The timing of information transfer in the visual system
Nowak, L. G., & Bullier, J. (1997) · Cerebral cortex · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-9625-4_5 · Cited by 444
Modeling Sleep and Wakefulness in the Thalamocortical System
Hill, S., & Tononi, G. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00915.2004 · Cited by 417
The emergence and evolution of mammalian neocortex
Glenn Northcutt, R., & Kaas, J. H. (1995) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(95)93932-n · Cited by 378
Hof, P. R., & Van Der Gucht, E. (2007) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.20407 · Cited by 257
Cerebral organoids: ethical issues and consciousness assessment
Lavazza, A., & Massimini, M. (2018) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2017-104555 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Payne, B. R.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2020427957
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for Visual Cortical Area Homologs in Cat and Macaque Monkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/3.1.1
- The paper
- Payne, B. R. (1993). Evidence for Visual Cortical Area Homologs in Cat and Macaque Monkey. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/3.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.