Cited by 217Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsBiomedical Ethics and RegulationPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Cerebral organoids: ethical issues and consciousness assessment

Open access
Lavazza, Andrea, Massimini, Marcello·2018·Journal of Medical Ethics

Abstract

Organoids are three-dimensional biological structures grown in vitro from different kinds of stem cells that self-organise mimicking real organs with organ-specific cell types. Recently, researchers have managed to produce human organoids which have structural and functional properties very similar to those of different organs, such as the retina, the intestines, the kidneys, the pancreas, the liver and the inner ear. Organoids are considered a great resource for biomedical research, as they allow for a detailed study of the development and pathologies of human cells; they also make it possible to test new molecules on human tissue. Furthermore, organoids have helped research take a step forward in the field of personalised medicine and transplants. However, some ethical issues have arisen concerning the origin of the cells that are used to produce organoids (ie, human embryos) and their properties. In particular, there are new, relevant and so-far overlooked ethical questions concerning cerebral organoids. Scientists have created so-called mini-brains as developed as a few-months-old fetus, albeit smaller and with many structural and functional differences. However, cerebral organoids exhibit neural connections and electrical activity, raising the question whether they are or (which is more likely) will one day be somewhat sentient. In principle, this can be measured with some techniques that are already available (the Perturbational Complexity Index, a metric that is directly inspired by the main postulate of the Integrated Information Theory of consciousness), which are used for brain-injured non-communicating patients. If brain organoids were to show a glimpse of sensibility, an ethical discussion on their use in clinical research and practice would be necessary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/medethics-2017-104555

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is debate about the presence or possibility of consciousness in nonhuman animals, neural organoids, AI systems, and xenobots.

    “There is also debate about the presence or possibility of consciousness in nonhuman animals [16 -21], neural organoids [22 -24], AI systems [25 -29], and xenobots [30,31].”

    From Tests for consciousness in humans and beyond (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lavazza, A., & Massimini, M.
Affiliations
  • Centro Universitario Internazionale (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Lavazza, Andrea
Venue
Journal of Medical Ethics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-02-28
Volume
44
Issue
9
Pages
606-610
ISSN
  • 0306-6800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4257
OpenAlex
W2793444251
Cited by
217
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
brain organoids, sentience, consciousness assessment, perturbational complexity index, integrated information theory, ethical considerations, human embryo, neural electrical activity, clinical research ethics
MeSH terms
Brain, Consciousness, Humans, Organoids, Stem Cells, Ethics, Research, Fetal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review