The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Representing Spatial Information for Limb Movement: Role of Area 5 in the Monkey
Abstract
How is spatial information for limb movement encoded in the brain? Computational and psychophysical studies suggest that beginning hand position, via-points, and target are specified relative to the body to afford a comparison between the sensory (e.g., kinesthetic) reafferences and the commands that generate limb movement. Here we propose that the superior parietal lobule (Brodmann area 5) might represent a substrate for a body-centered positional code. Monkeys made arm movements in different parts of 3D space in a reaction-time task. We found that the activity of area 5 neurons can be related to either the starting point, or the final point, or combinations of the two. Neural activity is monotonically tuned in a body-centered frame of reference, whose coordinates define the azimuth, elevation, and distance of the hand. Each spatial coordinate tends to be encoded in a different subpopulation of neurons. This parcellation could be a neural correlate of the psychophysical observation that these spatial parameters are processed in parallel and largely independent of each other in man.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More specifically, the dorsal component of the SLF (SLF I) connects the dorsal and medial part of the frontal lobe (i.e., right middle frontal gyrus in Table 2) with the cingulate (Table 3) and cingulum (Table 5) of the superior and medial parietal cortex [56, 57].”
From The brain anatomy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in young adults—a magnetic resonance imaging study (2017) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–401 of 401
Selectivity for Movement Direction in the Human Brain
Fabbri, S. (2011) · Unitn-eprints PhD (University of Trento) · doi:10.15168/11572_368775
Metadata
- Authors
- Lacquaniti, F., Guigon, E., Bianchi, L., Ferraina, S., & Caminiti, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Lacquaniti, F.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 391-409
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2075717557
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 8.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- superior parietal lobule, limb movement, arm reaching, hand position, altitude, distance, population coding, reaction time task
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arm, Electrophysiology, Macaca nemestrina, Microelectrodes, Models, Neurological, Movement, Neurons, Orientation, Parietal Lobe, Reaction Time, Space Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review