The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional Anatomy of Pointing and Grasping in Humans
Abstract
The functional anatomy of reaching and grasping simple objects was determined in nine healthy subjects with positron emission tomography imaging of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). In a prehension (grasping) task, subjects reached and grasped illuminated cylindrical objects with their right hand. In a pointing task, subjects reached and pointed over the same targets. In a control condition subjects looked at the targets. Both movement tasks increased activity in a distributed set of cortical and subcortical sites: contralateral motor, premotor, ventral supplementary motor area (SMA), cingulate, superior parietal, and dorsal occipital cortex. Cortical areas including cuneate and dorsal occipital cortex were more extensively activated than ventral occipital or temporal pathways. The left parietal operculum (putative SII) was recruited during grasping but not pointing. Blood flow changes were individually localized with respect to local cortical anatomy using sulcal landmarks. Consistent anatomic landmarks from MRI scans could be identified to locate sensorimotor, ventral SMA, and SII blood flow increases. The time required to complete individual movements and the amount of movement made during imaging correlated positively with the magnitude of rCBF increases during grasping in the contralateral inferior sensorimotor, cingulate, and ipsilateral inferior temporal cortex, and bilateral anterior cerebellum. This functional-anatomic study defines a cortical system for "pragmatic' manipulation of simple neutral objects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography
Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadary, B., Woods, R., Mazziotta, J. C., & Fazio, F. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/371600a0 · Cited by 976
Self-citationGrafton, S. T., Woods, R. P., & Tyszka, M. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460010307 · Cited by 214
Self-citation
Cited by
The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates
Cavanna, A. E., & Trimble, M. R. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl004 · Cited by 5,128
Grafton, S., Arbib, M., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00227183 · Cited by 1,045
Self-citationPartially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements.
Gerardin, E. (2000) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/10.11.1093 · Cited by 930
Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe
Wolpert, D. M., Goodbody, S. J., & Husain, M. (1998) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/2245 · Cited by 745
Experience-dependent changes in cerebral activation during human REM sleep
Maquet, P., Laureys, S., Peigneux, P., Fuchs, S., Petiau, C., Phillips, C., Aerts, J., Del Fiore, G., Degueldre, C., Meulemans, T., et al. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/77744 · Cited by 747
Metadata
- Authors
- Grafton, S. T., Fagg, A. H., Woods, R. P., & Arbib, M. A.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 226-237
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2151094513
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Anatomy of Pointing and Grasping in Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/6.2.226
- The paper
- Grafton, S. T., Fagg, A. H., Woods, R. P., & Arbib, M. A. (1996). Functional Anatomy of Pointing and Grasping in Humans. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/6.2.226
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.