Cited by 404Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeurological disorders and treatments

Stop-Signal Reaction-Time Task Performance: Role of Prefrontal Cortex and Subthalamic Nucleus

Eagle, D. M., Baunez, C., Hutcheson, D. M., Lehmann, O., Shah, A. P., Robbins, T. W.·2008·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

The stop-signal reaction-time (SSRT) task measures inhibition of a response that has already been initiated, that is, the ability to stop. Human subjects classified as "impulsive," for example, those with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, are slower to respond to the stop signal. Although functional and structural imaging studies in humans have implicated frontal and basal ganglia circuitry in the mediation of this form of response control, the precise roles of the cortex and basal ganglia in SSRT performance are far from understood. We describe effects of excitotoxic fiber-sparing lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex (OF), infralimbic cortex (IL), and subthalamic nucleus (STN) in rats performing a SSRT task. Lesions to the OF slowed SSRT, whereas lesions to the IL or the STN had no effect. On the go-signal trials, neither cortical lesion affected go-trial reaction time (GoRT), but STN lesions speeded such latencies. The STN lesion also significantly reduced accuracy of stopping at all stop-signal delays, indicative of a generalized stopping impairment that was independent of the SSRT itself.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhm044

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lesions to STN and STN stimulation in Parkinson patients affect both go RT and SSRT.

    “Lesions to STN and stimulation of STN in Parkinson patients influence both go RT and SSRT [29, 30].”

    From Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm (2008) · cites this paper as [30]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 404

Authors
Eagle, D. M., Baunez, C., Hutcheson, D. M., Lehmann, O., Shah, A. P., & Robbins, T. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2007-05-20
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
178-188
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2156001698
Cited by
404
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 20
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
stop-signal reaction time, response inhibition, orbitofrontal cortex, infralimbic cortex, subthalamic nucleus, basal ganglia, impulsivity, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Choice Behavior, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Reaction Time, Set, Psychology, Task Performance and Analysis, Prefrontal Cortex, Subthalamic Nucleus, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review