The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Similarity-Based Extraction of Individual Networks from Gray Matter MRI Scans
Open accessAbstract
The characterization of gray matter morphology of individual brains is an important issue in neuroscience. Graph theory has been used to describe cortical morphology, with networks based on covariation of gray matter volume or thickness between cortical areas across people. Here, we extend this research by proposing a new method that describes the gray matter morphology of an individual cortex as a network. In these large-scale morphological networks, nodes represent small cortical regions, and edges connect regions that have a statistically similar structure. The method was applied to a healthy sample (n = 14, scanned at 2 different time points). For all networks, we described the spatial degree distribution, average minimum path length, average clustering coefficient, small world property, and betweenness centrality (BC). Finally, we studied the reproducibility of all these properties. The networks showed more clustering than random networks and a similar minimum path length, indicating that they were "small world." The spatial degree and BC distributions corresponded closely to those from group-derived networks. All network property values were reproducible over the 2 time points examined. Our results demonstrate that intracortical similarities can be used to provide a robust statistical description of individual gray matter morphology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
A note on two problems in connexion with graphs
Dijkstra, E. W. (1959) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf01386390 · Cited by 24,043
Statistical mechanics of complex networks
Albert, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.47 · Cited by 20,471
The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450342480 · Cited by 18,719
Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., & Joliot, M. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 · Cited by 16,319
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190
Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2575 · Cited by 11,820
Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations
Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 · Cited by 11,522
The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency
Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998 · Cited by 10,490
Cited by
Imaging structural co-variance between human brain regions
Alexander-Bloch, A., Giedd, J. N., & Bullmore, E. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3465 · Cited by 1,064
The organization of physiological brain networks
Stam, C. J., & van Straaten, E. C. W. (2012) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2012.01.011 · Cited by 567
Networks of anatomical covariance
Evans, A. C. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.054 · Cited by 429
Alzheimer's disease: connecting findings from graph theoretical studies of brain networks
Tijms, B. M., Wink, A. M., de Haan, W., van der Flier, W. M., Stam, C. J., Scheltens, P., & Barkhof, F. (2013) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.02.020 · Cited by 416
Self-citationMayer, E. A., Labus, J. S., Tillisch, K., Cole, S. W., & Baldi, P. (2015) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2015.121 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Tijms, B. M., Series, P., Willshaw, D. J., & Lawrie, S. M.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-08-30
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1530-1541
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2158244090
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 93
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Similarity-Based Extraction of Individual Networks from Gray Matter MRI Scans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/bhr221
- The paper
- Tijms, B. M., Series, P., Willshaw, D. J., & Lawrie, S. M. (2012). Similarity-Based Extraction of Individual Networks from Gray Matter MRI Scans. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.