The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding and Feeling the Musical Beat: Striatal Dissociations between Detection and Prediction of Regularity
Open accessAbstract
Perception of temporal patterns is critical for speech, movement, and music. In the auditory domain, perception of a regular pulse, or beat, within a sequence of temporal intervals is associated with basal ganglia activity. Two alternative accounts of this striatal activity are possible: "searching" for temporal regularity in early stimulus processing stages or "prediction' of the timing of future tones after the beat is found (relying on continuation of an internally generated beat). To resolve between these accounts, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate different stages of beat perception. Participants heard a series of beat and nonbeat (irregular) monotone sequences. For each sequence, the preceding sequence provided a temporal beat context for the following sequence. Beat sequences were preceded by nonbeat sequences, requiring the beat to be found anew ("beat finding" condition), or by beat sequences with the same beat rate ("beat continuation"), or a different rate ("beat adjustment"). Detection of regularity is highest during beat finding, whereas generation and prediction are highest during beat continuation. We found the greatest striatal activity for beat continuation, less for beat adjustment, and the least for beat finding. Thus, the basal ganglia's response profile suggests a role in beat prediction, not in beat finding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?
Friston, K. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2787 · Cited by 8,120 · cited 1×
“Accurate prediction is a key factor in this process (Friston 2010).”
BackgroundBehavioral Theories and the Neurophysiology of Reward
Schultz, W. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070229 · Cited by 1,637
Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention
Desimone, R. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.24.13494 · Cited by 1,028 · cited 2×
“Work in other domains has found decreased neural responses to repeated stimuli: a phenomenon known as repetition suppression or neural adaptation (Desimone 1996; Henson and Rugg 2003).”
Background
Cited by
Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006–2012).
Repp, B. H., & Su, Y.-H. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2 · Cited by 1,204
Keller, P. E., Novembre, G., & Hove, M. J. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0394 · Cited by 466
Keitel, A., Gross, J., & Kayser, C. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004473 · Cited by 312
Rhythmic entrainment as a musical affect induction mechanism
J. Trost, W., Labbé, C., & Grandjean, D. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.004 · Cited by 209
Mondok, C., & Wiener, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.1000995 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Grahn, J. A., & Rowe, J. B.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-04-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 913-921
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2148384586
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Finding and Feeling the Musical Beat: Striatal Dissociations between Detection and Prediction of Regularity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/bhs083
- The paper
- Grahn, J. A., & Rowe, J. B. (2013). Finding and Feeling the Musical Beat: Striatal Dissociations between Detection and Prediction of Regularity. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs083
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.