Cited by 466Action Observation and SynchronizationNeuroscience and Music PerceptionEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Rhythm in joint action: psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination

Open access
Keller, Peter E., Novembre, Giacomo, Hove, Michael J.·2014·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Human interaction often requires simultaneous precision and flexibility in the coordination of rhythmic behaviour between individuals engaged in joint activity, for example, playing a musical duet or dancing with a partner. This review article addresses the psychological processes and brain mechanisms that enable such rhythmic interpersonal coordination. First, an overview is given of research on the cognitive-motor processes that enable individuals to represent joint action goals and to anticipate, attend and adapt to other's actions in real time. Second, the neurophysiological mechanisms that underpin rhythmic interpersonal coordination are sought in studies of sensorimotor and cognitive processes that play a role in the representation and integration of self- and other-related actions within and between individuals' brains. Finally, relationships between social–psychological factors and rhythmic interpersonal coordination are considered from two perspectives, one concerning how social-cognitive tendencies (e.g. empathy) affect coordination, and the other concerning how coordination affects interpersonal affiliation, trust and prosocial behaviour. Our review highlights musical ensemble performance as an ecologically valid yet readily controlled domain for investigating rhythm in joint action.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2013.0394

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synchronized behavior between individuals in a dyadic joint activity increases cooperation, liking and rapport.

    “Synchronized behavior between individuals in a dyadic joint activity increases cooperation, liking and rapport39,40.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keller, P. E., Novembre, G., & Hove, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Keller, Peter E.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2014-12-19
Volume
369
Issue
1658
Pages
20130394
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2320899008
Cited by
466
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH16259-31, T32MH016259)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
joint action, interpersonal coordination, rhythm, action prediction, sensorimotor processing, empathy, trust, prosocial behavior, social cognition
MeSH terms
Cognition, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Joints, Movement, Music, Periodicity, Psychomotor Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review