The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychophysical evidence that oral astringency is a tactile sensation
Abstract
Aluminum potassium sulphate [AIK(SO4)2 12H2O—‘alum’] was tested for its ability to elicit oral astringency independently of its ability to elicit taste. First, the astringency produced by alum (10 g/l; 21.1 mM) on the non-gustatory surfaces between the gum and the upper lip was measured. Subjects reported that alum elicited sensations of astringency when the upper lip was moved laterally against the gum. Second, subjects dipped the tongue into two solutions—alum or a mixture solution that approximated the taste of alum—and attempted to determine which solution was more astringent. A slight tendency was found for subjects to identify the mixture as more astringent than the alum. However, the same subjects reported the alum to be more astringent than the mixture when the same solutions were applied under the upper lip. These two experiments support the hypothesis that tactile stimulation is important for producing astringency, whereas taste stimulation of the anterior tongue is not. Third, after the application of alum, lubricating rinses (water, sucrose, Salivart®, corn oil, and the subjects' own saliva) were compared for their ability to decrease astringency. The lubricants reliably decreased original astringency, but to varying degrees depending upon their lubricating properties. All three experiments suggest that tactile sensations caused by increased friction (decreases,in salivary lubrication) between oral membranes are the primary basis of astringent sensations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Scharbert, S., Holzmann, N., & Hofmann, T. (2004) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf049802u · Cited by 485
Orosensory-Directed Identification of Astringent Mouthfeel and Bitter-Tasting Compounds in Red Wine
Hufnagel, J. C., & Hofmann, T. (2008) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf073031n · Cited by 324
Tannins in Food: Insights into the Molecular Perception of Astringency and Bitter Taste
Soares, S., Brandão, E., Guerreiro, C., Soares, S., Mateus, N., & de Freitas, V. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25112590 · Cited by 308
A review on astringency and bitterness perception of tannins in wine
Ma, W., Guo, A., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Liu, Y., & Li, H. (2014) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2014.08.001 · Cited by 306
The neural mechanisms of gustation: A distributed processing code
Simon, S. A., de Araujo, I. E., Gutierrez, R., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2006) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2006 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Breslin, P. A. S., Gilmore, M. M., Beauchamp, G. K., & Green, B. G.
- Venue
- Chemical Senses
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 405-417
- ISSN
- 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3553
- OpenAlex
- W2012085532
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychophysical evidence that oral astringency is a tactile sensation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/chemse/18.4.405
- The paper
- Breslin, P. A. S., Gilmore, M. M., Beauchamp, G. K., & Green, B. G. (1993). Psychophysical evidence that oral astringency is a tactile sensation. Chemical Senses. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/18.4.405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.