The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties
Abstract
A Scale of oral sensation was constructed by having subjects rate the perceptual magnitudes of semantic descriptors (e.g. ‘weak’, ‘strong’) within the context of imagined gustatory and somesthetic sensations (e.g. ‘the sweetness of banana’, ‘biting the tongue’), then arranging the descriptors according to their mean perceptual intensities. The resulting scale, which we refer to as the oral labeled magnitude scale (LMS), is characterized by a non-linear spacing among its verbal descriptors that, like Borg's (1982) category-ratio scale, is roughly logarithmic. The LMS was evaluated by comparing it with the method of magnitude estimation in an experiment in which subjects rated the intensity of sensations of sweetness, chemical irritation and cold. The psychophysical functions produced by the two methods were not statistically different, indicating that the oral LMS yielded ratio-level data comparable to that produced by magnitude estimation. A final experiment demonstrated the importance of the spacing among semantic descriptors by showing that both the psychophysical functions and the semantic information about perceptual intensity were altered when the descriptors were equally spaced. Theoretical and practical issues related to the empirical approach to scale construction and the generality and robustness of the oral LMS are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sex differences in the neural basis of emotional memories
Canli, T., Desmond, J. E., Zhao, Z., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.162356599 · Cited by 664
An overview of binary taste–taste interactions
Keast, R. S. J., & Breslin, P. A. S. (2003) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(02)00110-6 · Cited by 615
Hedonic scaling: A review of methods and theory
Lim, J. (2011) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.05.008 · Cited by 521
Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake
Dinehart, M. E., Hayes, J. E., Bartoshuk, L. M., Lanier, S. L., & Duffy, V. B. (2006) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.10.018 · Cited by 422
A LABELED AFFECTIVE MAGNITUDE (LAM) SCALE FOR ASSESSING FOOD LIKING/DISLIKING1
SCHUTZ, H. G., & CARDELLO, A. V. (2001) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1745-459x.2001.tb00293.x · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, B. G., Shaffer, G. S., & Gilmore, M. M.
- Venue
- Chemical Senses
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 683-702
- ISSN
- 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3553
- OpenAlex
- W2048786655
- Cited by
- 602
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/chemse/18.6.683
- The paper
- Green, B. G., Shaffer, G. S., & Gilmore, M. M. (1993). Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties. Chemical Senses. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/18.6.683
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.