The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Taste Sensitivity and Aging: High Incidence of Decline Revealed by Repeated Threshold Measures
Abstract
Contrary to what has often been said about the subject, decline in taste sensitivity with aging characterizes virtually everybody and is not the artificial result of averaging large losses of a minority with negligible losses of a majority. This assertion is supported by six repeated measures of sucrose thresholds in each of 15 older (over 64 years) and 15 younger (under 27 years) adult subjects. Threshold was determined by a procedure similar to past studies and with the same results: much scatter and considerable overlap between the thresholds of younger and older subjects. A quite contrasting picture emerges, however, when each subject's six threshold determinations are averaged. Averaging shrinks the individual differences among subjects, as well as the over-lap between younger and older subjects. Although virtually all elderly subjects now revealed taste weakness, reliable individual differences in degree of weakness abound among them, suggesting various individual rates of physiological aging. In contrast, young persons exhibit greater uniformity of sensitivity. These findings were brought out by inter-test correlations, which were much higher for the older subjects; i.e. an older subject who tended to score high (low) on one test tended to score high (low) on the other tests. The study confirms the tenuous nature of brief threshold tests as indices of personal sensitivity as found earlier also in olfactory thresholds and in concurrent measurement of two-point touch thresholds in the present study. This revealed correlated losses between repeated taste and touch thresholds from the same 15 older subjects, unrelated to their exact chronological age.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While the cardiac, respiratory and gastric tests described above are the most commonly used measures used to explicitly assess interoceptive ability, as a wide variety of signals are considered to be interoceptive in nature, we would suggest that a range of existing perceptual sensitivity measures are in fact also measures of interoceptive ability.”
From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Stevens et al., 1995
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anorexia of aging: physiologic and pathologic
Morley, J. (1997) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/66.4.760 · Cited by 761
Descriptive sensory analysis: past, present and future
Murray, J. M., Delahunty, C. M., & Baxter, I. A. (2001) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/s0963-9969(01)00070-9 · Cited by 743
Receptors and transduction in taste
Lindemann, B. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35093032 · Cited by 696
“For example, aged people often have a general decline of taste functio”
BackgroundTaste and smell losses in normal aging and disease.
Schiffman, S. (1997) · Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550160077042 · Cited by 592
Bartoshuk, L. M. (2000) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/25.4.447 · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevens, J. C., Cruz, L. A., Hoffman, J. M., & Patterson, M. Q.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stevens, Joseph C.
- Venue
- Chemical Senses
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 451-459
- ISSN
- 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3553
- OpenAlex
- W1995439904
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemical Senses (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ag010295-08)
- National Institute on Aging (AG 10295, AG04287)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- taste sensitivity, aging, individual differences, physiological aging, inter-test correlation, odor threshold
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Discrimination Learning, Humans, Individuality, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sensory Thresholds, Taste Disorders, Taste Threshold, Touch, Incidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review